Skip to content

board: add support for nrf54ls05a - #844

Merged
eivindj-nordic merged 1 commit into
nrfconnect:mainfrom
bjorn-tore-taraldsen:nRF54LS05A
Sep 2, 2026
Merged

board: add support for nrf54ls05a#844
eivindj-nordic merged 1 commit into
nrfconnect:mainfrom
bjorn-tore-taraldsen:nRF54LS05A

Conversation

@bjorn-tore-taraldsen

@bjorn-tore-taraldsen bjorn-tore-taraldsen commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Add support for new device nRF54LS05A

test_sdk_dfu: PR-886

@bjorn-tore-taraldsen
bjorn-tore-taraldsen requested review from a team and rghaddab as code owners August 20, 2026 10:43
@bjorn-tore-taraldsen bjorn-tore-taraldsen added the DNM Do not merge label Aug 20, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added changelog-entry-required Update changelog before merge. Remove label if entry is not needed or already added. doc-required PR must not be merged without tech writer approval. labels Aug 20, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You can find the documentation preview for this PR here.

@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the changelog-entry-required Update changelog before merge. Remove label if entry is not needed or already added. label Aug 20, 2026
Comment thread samples/peripherals/pwm/README.rst Outdated
Comment thread doc/nrf-bm/release_notes/release_notes_changelog.rst Outdated
Comment thread doc/nrf-bm/includes/supported_boards_all_non-mcuboot_variants_s145.txt Outdated
@bjorn-tore-taraldsen
bjorn-tore-taraldsen force-pushed the nRF54LS05A branch 4 times, most recently from 59c6024 to 12d6270 Compare August 20, 2026 12:03
@bjorn-tore-taraldsen bjorn-tore-taraldsen changed the title device: add support for nrf54ls05a board: add support for nrf54ls05a Aug 20, 2026
Comment thread boards/nordic/bm_nrf54ls05dk/bm_nrf54ls05dk_nrf54ls05a_cpuapp_common.dtsi Outdated
Comment on lines +52 to +53
extra_args:
- mcuboot_CONFIG_NRF_OBERON=y

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

are we expecting users having to manually set this also? Shouldn't it default to this on this SoC?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ncs-eris what do you think.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I should be the default option for this SoC.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nvlsianpu Could this setting then be removed and it will use Oberon as default?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No - NCS 3.4.0 doesn't default to NRF_OBERON (patched in coming newer version). Don't know whether there is good place in nrf-bm to make this default selection.

Comment thread samples/boot/mcuboot_recovery_retention/sample.yaml Outdated
@bjorn-tore-taraldsen
bjorn-tore-taraldsen force-pushed the nRF54LS05A branch 4 times, most recently from e729ecc to d171b97 Compare August 26, 2026 13:39
@bjorn-tore-taraldsen bjorn-tore-taraldsen removed the DNM Do not merge label Aug 26, 2026
@b-gent

b-gent commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The bootloader_keys.rst file has not been updated.
https://ncsbmdoc.z6.web.core.windows.net/ncs-bm/PR-844/nrf-bm/app_dev/dfu/bootloader_keys.html

It mentions nRF54LS05B on 3 different occasions, should it now also mention nRF54LS05A?

Comment thread doc/nrf-bm/release_notes/release_notes_changelog.rst Outdated
Comment thread doc/nrf-bm/includes/supported_boards_all_mcuboot_variants_s115.txt Outdated
Comment thread samples/peripherals/pwm/README.rst Outdated
Comment thread samples/peripherals/pwm/README.rst
MCUboot in |BMshort| allow a few signatures types.
The ED25519 signature type is recommended as supported for nRF54L Series devices with cryptographic hardware support (CRACEN and KMU).
The ED25519 signature type is available for nRF54LS05B devices as well, but it is supported by software only (``nrf_oberon``).
The ED25519 signature type is available for nRF54LS05BA and nRF54LS05B devices as well, but it is supported by software only (``nrf_oberon``).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So, there was a mistake in the sentence:
rephrased:

The ED25519 signature type is available for nRF54LS05BA and nRF54LS05B devices as well, but it is supported by software only (``PSA_crypto`).

And size optimal implementation is:
The ECDSA P256 signature type is recommended for nRF54LS05BA and nRF54LS05B devices as well, it is supported by software only (nrf_oberon).

Comment thread boards/nordic/bm_nrf54ls05dk/bm_nrf54ls05dk_nrf54ls05a_cpuapp_s115_softdevice.dts Outdated
Add support for new board nRF54LS05 DK/ nrf54LS05a

Signed-off-by: Bjørn Tore Taraldsen <bjorn.tore.taraldsen@nordicsemi.no>
@eivindj-nordic
eivindj-nordic merged commit f388804 into nrfconnect:main Sep 2, 2026
18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

doc-required PR must not be merged without tech writer approval.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants