Change to ROS1 version of ros2_v4l2_camera#122
Merged
BenjaminKrummenacher merged 5 commits intomainfrom Aug 18, 2023
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Switched to driver suggested by Tier4:
"Are you using ROS1? If so, there are some issues with usb-cam that MAP IV(Our partner's company) also ran into, so they built a ROS1 version of ros2_v4l2_camera which has been tested to work well with C1:
tier4/ros2_v4l2_camera#11"
So far no image jitter / image tearing observed
The driver is still only a pull request and not merged into the branch, as its only 1 week old.
Check later if it is merged, then merge the ROS1 branch