Skip to content

Add form key 'extraProperties' and deprecate 'uniforms'#54

Merged
Mark90 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
add-pydanticforms-in-schema
Feb 19, 2026
Merged

Add form key 'extraProperties' and deprecate 'uniforms'#54
Mark90 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
add-pydanticforms-in-schema

Conversation

@Mark90
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Mark90 Mark90 commented Feb 16, 2026

Relates to workfloworchestrator/orchestrator-core#1367

Changes the form schema to include the key "extraProperties" with the same content as "uniforms" which is now deprecated.

This will be released in pydantic-forms 2.4.0

@sentry
Copy link
Copy Markdown

sentry bot commented Feb 16, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.33%. Comparing base (443f867) to head (4237d82).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #54      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.23%   92.33%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          31       32       +1     
  Lines         644      652       +8     
  Branches       69       69              
==========================================
+ Hits          594      602       +8     
  Misses         46       46              
  Partials        4        4              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Mark90 Mark90 force-pushed the add-pydanticforms-in-schema branch from e8d7be2 to 4237d82 Compare February 17, 2026 10:27
@Mark90 Mark90 changed the title Add form key 'pydanticforms' and deprecate 'uniforms' Add form key 'extraProperties' and deprecate 'uniforms' Feb 17, 2026
Comment thread pydantic_forms/validators/components/migration_summary.py
@Mark90 Mark90 merged commit 3c246b3 into main Feb 19, 2026
19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants