Speed Improvement of Pixel Aggregation#115
Open
Zerohertz wants to merge 2 commits intowhai362:masterfrom
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Dear Mr. Wang
Processing Time of
pan_pp.det_head.get_results()[ms] (Used data: ICDAR2015 [dataset])It was confirmed that pixel aggregation (pa.pyx) is dominant during the post-processing process for images with variously distributed strings.
Therefore, I modified the cython code to improve speed and parallel processing.
The result is a 4.629% improvement based on the ic15 dataset, but a huge speedup can be expected if there are numerous
labels. (Based on the dataset I used (documents), it's about 100 ms shorter.)Also modified the input of
cv2.resizeto solve the error below.Sincerely, Hyogeun Oh