Open
Conversation
Open
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Tooltips Issue
Linked Vitro PR
What does this pull request do?
Introduces WCAG-compliant tooltip behavior with improved keyboard focus handling and screen-reader accessibility.
What's new?
Tooltip can be focused using the tab key or accessed via screen readers
Tooltips can be opened using the keyboard
Clickable tooltips introduce a focus trap: Tab selection cycles through elements inside the tooltip
Hover tooltips are now selectable (they don’t disappear when the user moves the cursor onto the tooltip content)
Added i18n for some tooltip strings
How should this be tested?
Open the relevant page(s) and try navigating through all tooltip triggers using the keyboard (Tab / Shift+Tab)


Verify the following behaviors:
Interested parties
@VIVO-project/vivo-committers
Reviewers' expertise
Candidates for reviewing this PR should have some of the following expertises: