Skip to content

chore(deps): update remark-cjk-friendly and remark-cjk-friendly-gfm-strikethrough to v2.x#455

Merged
haydenbleasel merged 2 commits intovercel:mainfrom
tats-u:remark-cjk-friendly-v2
Mar 10, 2026
Merged

chore(deps): update remark-cjk-friendly and remark-cjk-friendly-gfm-strikethrough to v2.x#455
haydenbleasel merged 2 commits intovercel:mainfrom
tats-u:remark-cjk-friendly-v2

Conversation

@tats-u
Copy link
Contributor

@tats-u tats-u commented Mar 10, 2026

Description

Bump remark-cjk-friendly and remark-cjk-friendly-gfm-strikethrough from v1.x (^1.2.3) to v2.x (^2.0.1). The sole breaking change in v2.0.0 is dropping Node 16—Streamdown already requires Node ≥18, so no functional impact. Actual code is identical to the latest v1.x; v2.0.1 only added package.json importability. Net benefit: ~8kB install size reduction and version alignment with other consumers of these packages.

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation update
  • Performance improvement
  • Refactoring (no functional changes)

Related Issues

Related to #185

Changes Made

  • Updated remark-cjk-friendly and remark-cjk-friendly-gfm-strikethrough to ^2.0.1 in packages/streamdown-cjk/package.json and apps/test/package.json
    • Updated pnpm-lock.yaml
    • Added minor changeset for @streamdown/cjk

Testing

  • All existing tests pass
  • Added new tests for the changes (N/A)
  • Manually tested the changes (N/A)

Test Coverage

No code has been changed

Screenshots/Demos

No visual change

Checklist

  • My code follows the project's code style
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas (N/A)
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (N/A)
  • My changes generate no new warnings or errors
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (N/A)—The code itself has not been changed
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have created a changeset (pnpm changeset)

Changeset

  • I have created a changeset for these changes

Additional Notes

Based on tats-u#1
Copilot Coding Agent powered by Claude Opus 4.6
The changeset patch level should have been set to patch, but I mistakenly instructed it to be minor. I corrected it by hand.

Copilot AI and others added 2 commits March 10, 2026 21:31
…to v2.x

Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tatsunori Uchino <tats.u@live.jp>
@vercel
Copy link
Contributor

vercel bot commented Mar 10, 2026

@tats-u is attempting to deploy a commit to the Vercel Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@socket-security
Copy link

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Diff Package Supply Chain
Security
Vulnerability Quality Maintenance License
Updatedremark-cjk-friendly-gfm-strikethrough@​1.2.3 ⏵ 2.0.11001009792 +1100
Updatedremark-cjk-friendly@​1.2.3 ⏵ 2.0.11001009792 +4100

View full report

@tats-u tats-u changed the title Update remark-cjk-friendly and remark-cjk-friendly-gfm-strikethrough to v2.x chore(deps): update remark-cjk-friendly and remark-cjk-friendly-gfm-strikethrough to v2.x Mar 10, 2026
@haydenbleasel
Copy link
Member

Thanks @tats-u 🙏

@haydenbleasel haydenbleasel merged commit 6f1ea07 into vercel:main Mar 10, 2026
3 of 5 checks passed
@tats-u tats-u deleted the remark-cjk-friendly-v2 branch March 10, 2026 23:08
@tats-u
Copy link
Contributor Author

tats-u commented Mar 10, 2026

Thank you for the merge, but I forgot to mention that the reason their size decreased was simply because I optimized the bundle method and eliminated code duplication by switching their bundler from tsup to tsdown.

@tats-u
Copy link
Contributor Author

tats-u commented Mar 10, 2026

It's a hassle to have to create a new Changeset file just to fix another Changeset.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants