first attempt at providing an XMLSchema for dfg-viewer.de namespace

[bertsky]

There has been an informal definition of an XML namespace http://dfg-viewer.de in various parts of Kitodo and DFG Viewer for some time. Without a formalization, there is no validation, and re-implementation is difficult. I tried to fill the gap here, but …

1. not sure if this is the right place. Perhaps better use a new repo?
2. not sure about various details (see fixmes and references in the XSD). I had to rework from the implementations and example XMLs I could find. Perhaps I missed or misinterpreted some of them?
3. not sure whether a single XSD for the 4 different roots is adequate, and how we can validate that the right kind of root gets used in the right context – i.e.
   • dv:rights only in mets:amdSec/mets:rightsMD,
   • dv:links only in mets:amdSec/mets:digiprovMD,
   • ?? only in mets:amdSec/mets:techMD,
   • dv:page only in SRU responses).

I have added the XSD under Resources/Public/Xsd/dfg-viewer.xsd – which could be used as a schemaLocation for dv XMLs in the future. I also added some example XMLs as test cases, which should probably go somewhere else.

@sebastian-meyer @Erikmitk

[bertsky]

We should probably also formalize the METS and MODS Anwendungsprofile, including the Strukturdatenset BTW.

[bertsky]

One more thing: I noticed some obvious inconsistencies in the dv:page documentation part of the SRU/ALTO Anwendungsprofil:

• there is a @url on the top-level dv:page in the example, but not such entry in the documentation
• the dv:page/dv:fulltexthit is documented as not repeatable, but in the implementation it clearly is
• the dv:page/dv:fulltexthit/dv:page is documented as not repeatable, but in the example, it clearly is

[MarcMoschSLUB]

Thanks @bertsky. We will most likely pick up this issue with DFG-Viewer 3D second phase. It can serve as a base for the METS validator (AP 1-3 at https://intranet.slub-dresden.de/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=488903266).

[bertsky]

Or do we have to include other values (like CNE or NoC) here, too?

Cf. Europeana license codes.

[bertsky]

See respective DDB schematron rule