DOC: fix broken 404 contributor links in example notebooks#1012
Open
kabirvashisht4-glitch wants to merge 1 commit intosktime:mainfrom
Open
DOC: fix broken 404 contributor links in example notebooks#1012kabirvashisht4-glitch wants to merge 1 commit intosktime:mainfrom
kabirvashisht4-glitch wants to merge 1 commit intosktime:mainfrom
Conversation
|
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
Contributor
Author
|
@fkiraly , could you please review my PR |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reference Issues/PRs
Fixes #1011
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
Updated the "Contributors" link in the footer of all example notebooks in the examples/ directory. The previous link pointed to CONTRIBUTORS.md, which resulted in a 404 error. The link now correctly points to AUTHORS.rst.
Does your contribution introduce a new dependency?
No.
What should a reviewer concentrate their feedback on?
Checking that the markdown syntax in the .ipynb files is correct and that the link points to the intended AUTHORS.rst file.
Did you add any tests for the change?
No, this is a documentation-only fix.