This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 26, 2024. It is now read-only.
fix(v1): generate unions of options list values - #295
Open
ochicf wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
|
@ochicf is attempting to deploy a commit to the Rico Kahler Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Contributor
Author
|
@ricokahler added test. Just one small comment: I've set the order of list items in the structure and in the matching test object is different because the order of the list options is not respected, but always consistently returned as they are sorted by hash here. I guess this is the expected behaviour. |
w3bdesign
approved these changes
Jul 12, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reads the list option and defines the type of a union of those literal values. This should be probably tested.
Let me know if there's any other place where lists can be specified.
Fixes #63