Skip to content

Conversation

@wab
Copy link
Contributor

@wab wab commented Jan 13, 2026

Detailed analysis comparing the two design system approaches:

  • PR "clean" (BMAD): Process-driven, progressive Tailwind rationalization
  • PR "first": Technical specs with direct PandaCSS migration path

Includes:

  • Side-by-side comparison of tokens, components, documentation
  • Strengths and weaknesses analysis
  • Hybrid approach recommendation (scored 8.4/10)
  • Actionable implementation plan

Recommendation: Combine best of both worlds - start with low-risk Tailwind rationalization using detailed specs from "first", then migrate to PandaCSS using production-ready recipes.

Detailed analysis comparing the two design system approaches:
- PR "clean" (BMAD): Process-driven, progressive Tailwind rationalization
- PR "first": Technical specs with direct PandaCSS migration path

Includes:
- Side-by-side comparison of tokens, components, documentation
- Strengths and weaknesses analysis
- Hybrid approach recommendation (scored 8.4/10)
- Actionable implementation plan

Recommendation: Combine best of both worlds - start with low-risk
Tailwind rationalization using detailed specs from "first", then
migrate to PandaCSS using production-ready recipes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants