refactor(usecases): ensure that every repository call happens within uow#23
refactor(usecases): ensure that every repository call happens within uow#23madalinpopa merged 28 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
ReassignCategoryFromMonth
saveWithExecutor Wrap errors with context for better debugging. Extract saveWithExecutor to support custom DB executors.
Add month parsing to ensure valid input before querying groups.
Group create, update, and delete now use unit-of-work transactions for consistency and rollback on error.
Refactor tests to use mock UnitOfWork with transaction repositories, ensuring commit is called and repository methods are invoked within transaction context.
Ensures user creation is atomic by using a unit of work transaction during registration.
Ensures expense updates are atomic by using a unit of work transaction. Rollback is attempted on error or failed commit.
Ensures expense deletions are atomic and consistent by using a transactional unit of work.
Ensures income creation is atomic by using a transaction. Rolls back on error to maintain data integrity.
- Add icon and ARIA attributes to error alerts for better accessibility - Enhance dark mode support for error and field error components - Refine error component styling for consistency
Summary of ChangesHello @madalinpopa, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request primarily focuses on enhancing data consistency and reliability across the application by refactoring all use cases to strictly adhere to the Unit of Work pattern. This change ensures that all database operations within a single business transaction are properly committed or rolled back together. Alongside this significant architectural improvement, several repository methods were optimized for clarity and security, and minor UI adjustments were made to improve error presentation. Highlights
Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a significant refactoring by consistently applying the Unit of Work pattern across various use cases (Auth, Category, Expense, and Group). This change greatly enhances transactional integrity, ensuring that all related repository operations within a use case are committed or rolled back atomically. Additionally, a crucial security enhancement was implemented in the SQLiteExpenseRepository to prevent reassigning categories to another user's category, which is a valuable improvement. The associated test cases have been updated and expanded to cover the new transactional logic and the security fix, demonstrating thoroughness. Minor stylistic improvements were also made in the UI components, enhancing the user experience. Overall, this is a well-executed and impactful refactoring that improves both the robustness and security of the application.
1 participant
No description provided.