Fix exception during tag removal#935
Draft
paulgear wants to merge 2 commits intogetting-things-gnome:masterfrom
Draft
Fix exception during tag removal#935paulgear wants to merge 2 commits intogetting-things-gnome:masterfrom
paulgear wants to merge 2 commits intogetting-things-gnome:masterfrom
Conversation
Task2.remove_tag() expects a string, not a tag object.
"Should've" is not really very easy for non-native English speakers, so spell it out fully.
Member
|
The big refactoring has finally landed (see the pinned 0.7 tracking issue for details)! Please rebase this to the latest |
diegogangl
removed this from the
0.7: "Getting things Gradius — Destroy the core!" milestone
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Task2.remove_tag() expects a string, not a tag object.
Also fix grammar in error message shown when this bug is triggered. I think "should've" is not very easy for non-native English speakers, so I replaced all instances of it with the non-contracted form.