Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Hello again,
We don't have any special versions for real transforms (that would have full Hermitian coeff symmetry in all dimensions). Not many NUFFT packages do, because of the explosion of new interfaces it causes (NonuniformFFTs.jl being an exception).

Unless K_2 is very big, the padded cost may not be much higher than the "ideal" transform size of (2K_1+1)*(K_2+1), because nonuniform point operations tend to dominate (unless you have K_1K_2 >> M, the number of NU pts). So, first I suggest you benchmark the two Fourier mode sizes in your setting.

Your transform is slightly odd in that it only has Hermitian symm in the y-direction, so would not even be covered by a real transform.

You m…

Replies: 1 comment 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@unalmis
Comment options

Answer selected by unalmis
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants