sys-kernel/dracut: Bump to 109 ahead of Gentoo stabilisation #3616
+27
−3,810
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
They're a bit behind with the stabilisation and I need new features. Signed-off-by: James Le Cuirot <[email protected]>
Gentoo hasn't done this for a very long time because it's wrong. Signed-off-by: James Le Cuirot <[email protected]>
Spotted while comparing a local build with a recent nightly. Signed-off-by: James Le Cuirot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: James Le Cuirot <[email protected]>
chewi
force-pushed
the
chewi/dracut-109
branch
from
d90f01c to
a2b2ad6
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
sys-kernel/dracut: Bump to 109
Gentoo is a bit behind with the stabilisation and I need new features. Bumping this required reordering the bootengine Dracut modules. See flatcar/bootengine#116.
While I was at it, I added some missing dependencies to coreos-kernel that make a difference to the resulting initrd.
I also stopped the symlinking of
libtolib64in the minimal initrd. Gentoo hasn't done this for a very long time because it's wrong. We don't do it anywhere else.How to use
Just see whether it boots.
Testing done
A Jenkins run has passed aside from known issues.
There is obviously a lot of churn in the changes report from files moving around. I also compared the non-binary initrd contents against a recent nightly. Changes to the initrd itself are just what you'd expect from the bump. None of them are unexplained.
I also manually tested provisioning with systemd-cryptenroll against the TPM.
changelog/directory (user-facing change, bug fix, security fix, update)/bootand/usrsize, packages, list files for any missing binaries, kernel modules, config files, kernel modules, etc.