#6094 - It is possible to create antisense even if it is not allowed (when base has extra bond out of r1-r3 to sugar)#9659
Merged
AlexeyGirin merged 1 commit intomasterfrom Apr 3, 2026
Conversation
rrodionov91
approved these changes
Apr 3, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
How the feature works? / How did you fix the issue?
(Screenshots, videos, or GIFs, if applicable)
Summary
the
rnaBaseForSugarcondition was missing thecovalentBonds.length > 1check that already existed for directly selected
RNABasemonomers.had extra covalent bonds (e.g.
nC6n5Cbases connected viaR2-R2in HELM),allowing antisense creation to proceed incorrectly.
rnaBaseForSugar.covalentBonds.length > 1to the disabled condition,making it consistent with the direct
RNABasecheck.Check list
#1234 – issue name