Skip to content

Switches to UV#257

Merged
dgasmith merged 23 commits intomainfrom
uvify
Mar 19, 2026
Merged

Switches to UV#257
dgasmith merged 23 commits intomainfrom
uvify

Conversation

@dgasmith
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Description

Switches from Conda to UV for tests and CI. UV seems to resolve faster, be more canonical within the ML community, and has a number of nice bells.

Status

  • Ready to go

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Mar 14, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.86%. Comparing base (7003139) to head (e068355).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@j-wags j-wags left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, lots of little diffs from new relinting but the core changes (moving CI to UV) seems complete. Tensorflow tests can be re-enabled in another PR.

"mkdocs-material==9.*",
"pygments==2.*",
]
dev = ["opt_einsum[test,lint]"]
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(not blocking) Is this sufficient for most dev envs, or should other deps be pulled in?

@dgasmith dgasmith merged commit 2ebc7b8 into main Mar 19, 2026
10 checks passed
@dgasmith dgasmith deleted the uvify branch March 19, 2026 23:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants