Skip to content

Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 1: Workflow does not contain permissions#81

Merged
davep merged 1 commit intomainfrom
alert-autofix-1
Feb 3, 2026
Merged

Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 1: Workflow does not contain permissions#81
davep merged 1 commit intomainfrom
alert-autofix-1

Conversation

@davep
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@davep davep commented Feb 3, 2026

Potential fix for https://github.com/davep/peplum/security/code-scanning/1

In general, the fix is to explicitly define a permissions block in the workflow or job so that the GITHUB_TOKEN has only the minimum access required. For this job, it only checks out code and runs local tooling, so contents: read is sufficient; it does not need to write to the repo, update PRs, or interact with other resources.

The minimal, non‑functional‑changing fix is to add a permissions block to the style-lint-and-test job definition. Place it under the job name (and before runs-on) so it only applies to this job. The block should be:

permissions:
  contents: read

No imports or external dependencies are required; this is a pure YAML configuration change in .github/workflows/style-lint-and-test.yaml. No other parts of the workflow need modification, since the existing steps only require read access to the repository contents.

Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

…ain permissions

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@davep davep added the Housekeeping General codebase housekeeping label Feb 3, 2026
@davep davep marked this pull request as ready for review February 3, 2026 14:28
@davep davep merged commit d6220c1 into main Feb 3, 2026
8 checks passed
@davep davep deleted the alert-autofix-1 branch February 3, 2026 14:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Housekeeping General codebase housekeeping

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants