optimize(bpf): Delete tgid_pname_map

[jschwinger233]

Background

tgid_pname_map 只是用在 cookie_pid_map update 失败时的 fallback：

1. cookie_pid_map update 失败是少见的情况，在正常场景下不需维护 tgid_pname_map。
2. 就算是 cookie_pid_map update 失败，先 _update_map_elem_by_cookie() 里 tgid_pname_map[pid] = val 再在上层函数 update_map_elem_by_cookie() 里读 tgid_pname_map[pid] 也是多此一举，一个指针传递就行了，无需用 map。

这个 PR 直接删去了 cookie_pid_map 同时维持了 fallback 逻辑，减小了内核内存消耗，整整 8192 * (4 + 16) = 163840 bytes = 0.16384 Mb 呢！同时省去了 wan 代理时对每个 socket 的一次 map 操作，提升全局性能。

Checklist

• The Pull Request has been fully tested
• There's an entry in the CHANGELOGS
• There is a user-facing docs PR against https://github.com/daeuniverse/dae

Full Changelogs

• [Implement ...]

Issue Reference

Closes #[issue number]

Test Result

[ppdragon16]

求更新

[dae-intelligence]

求更新

Note

The following content has been translated from its original language using an automated process powered by a proprietary API. Segments originally written in English have been preserved, while non-English portions have been machine-translated for readability. Please be aware that minor inaccuracies may exist due to the automated nature of the translation.

Requesting an update.

[jschwinger233]

更新啥 没人review 😢

[dae-intelligence]

更新啥 没人review 😢

Note

The following content has been translated from its original language using an automated process powered by a proprietary API. Segments originally written in English have been preserved, while non-English portions have been machine-translated for readability. Please be aware that minor inaccuracies may exist due to the automated nature of the translation.

Update what? No one reviews 😢

[MaurUppi]

我的理解仅仅是check_pr_tested_label状态信息需要修改一下?
“The 'tested' label is not present in the PR, please perform some functional/unit tests before merging it.”

前面的 PR Build, Kernal test, BPF test 都通过了，意味着能用？