Open
Conversation
Vite 6 lib mode derives the CSS output filename from lib.name rather than using the hardcoded 'style.css' from Vite 5. Adding cssFileName: 'style' to the lib config restores the expected output path, keeping the package.json './style.css' export intact. Moreover, Vite 6 requires that exports are listed in the order to be applied. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Bumps node from 25.7.0-slim to 25.8.2-slim. --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: node dependency-version: 25.8.2-slim dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-minor ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Initialize activeTab state synchronously via lazy initializer instead of undefined, and remove redundant defaultValue prop from Radix Tabs Root. Eliminates the React warning in CrateTabsShad and SQLResults tests. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds autoResetPageIndex: false to prevent @tanstack/table-core from scheduling page-index resets via Promise.resolve() microtasks. Those deferred updates fired outside act() in synchronous tests, causing console warnings in SQLResultsTable and SQLResults test suites. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds a console.error spy in beforeAll to filter the "trigger element and popup element should in same shadow root" warning emitted by @rc-component/trigger in jsdom. The warning is a React 19 passive effect timing issue (dev-mode only) and does not affect test outcomes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…oads Eliminates the jsdom 'Not implemented: navigation' error in tests by removing bare <a href="data:..."> elements from SQLResultsTable. Download is now triggered via URL.createObjectURL + a transient anchor, keeping large data payloads out of the DOM. Tests updated to verify Blob type; test/setup.ts gains URL and anchor-click mocks required by jsdom. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
plaharanne
reviewed
Apr 27, 2026
| @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ | |||
| # Architecture | |||
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Did you commit the files of .planning/codebase on purpose? Is it for the developers or for AI? We should probably organize a meeting with the team to decide our practices.
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I added them on purpose but also asked about them in the description when creating the PR to kickstart the conversation within the team
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
oops, my bad, I missed it in the description
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary of changes
After #553, we saw many warnings and errors in the console when running test.
Instead of upgrading Ant Design (as outlined in ), AntD 5 can be compatible with React 19 with the right package. Other warnings are silenced only in the tests.
The branch is tested with https://github.com/crate/cloud-ui.
It might be easier to review commit-by-commit instead of file-by-file.
Question to reviewer(s): Do we want to keep files in
.planning/codebase?(files used by get-shit-done)
Checklist
Link to issue this PR refers to:Relevant changes are reflected inCHANGES.md.Added or changed code is covered by tests.Required Grand Central APIs are already merged.