Conversation
dosubot
bot
added
the
size:M
![cubic-dev-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1082092?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
cubic analysis
2 issues found across 1 file • Review in cubic
React with 👍 or 👎 to teach cubic. You can also tag @cubic-dev-ai to give feedback, ask questions, or re-run the review.
| # Run the CLI with a hardcoded prompt and output text directly | ||
| echo "Review this pull request and provide feedback on code quality" | cn --config "${{ inputs.assistant }}" -p | ||
| env: | ||
| CONTINUE_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.CONTINUE_API_KEY }} No newline at end of file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The job assumes secrets.CONTINUE_API_KEY is always available, but it will be empty for PRs from forks, leading to runtime failures
Prompt for AI agents
Address the following comment on .github/workflows/cli-review.yaml at line 36:
<comment>The job assumes `secrets.CONTINUE_API_KEY` is always available, but it will be empty for PRs from forks, leading to runtime failures</comment>
<file context>
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+name: CLI Review
+
+on:
+ pull_request:
+ branches:
+ - main
+
+ push:
+ branches:
</file context>
| echo "" | ||
|
|
||
| # Run the CLI with a hardcoded prompt and output text directly | ||
| echo "Review this pull request and provide feedback on code quality" | cn --config "${{ inputs.assistant }}" -p |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
inputs.assistant is undefined in this context, so the Continue CLI will receive an empty --config value and the step will fail at runtime
Prompt for AI agents
Address the following comment on .github/workflows/cli-review.yaml at line 34:
<comment>`inputs.assistant` is undefined in this context, so the Continue CLI will receive an empty `--config` value and the step will fail at runtime</comment>
<file context>
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+name: CLI Review
+
+on:
+ pull_request:
+ branches:
+ - main
+
+ push:
+ branches:
</file context>
|
|
||
| push: | ||
| branches: | ||
| - main |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we still need a code review if the commit has already been pushed to main?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
on:
pull_request:
types: [ready_for_review]
This would be ideal
| echo "" | ||
|
|
||
| # Run the CLI with a hardcoded prompt and output text directly | ||
| echo "Review this pull request and provide feedback on code quality" | cn --config "${{ inputs.assistant }}" -p |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Was the idea that we would check the github actions log to see the output of the review?
3 participants
Description
[ What changed? Feel free to be brief. ]
Checklist
Screen recording or screenshot
[ When applicable, please include a short screen recording or screenshot - this makes it much easier for us as contributors to review and understand your changes. See this PR as a good example. ]
Tests
[ What tests were added or updated to ensure the changes work as expected? ]
Summary by cubic
Added a GitHub Actions workflow to run the Continue CLI for automated code quality reviews on pull requests and pushes to main.