-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
topology-aware: initial scheduling class support. #626
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
klihub
wants to merge
10
commits into
containers:main
Choose a base branch
from
klihub:devel/topology-aware/scheduling-classes
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+1,202
−22
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0827e93
balloons: add schedulingClass and schedulingClasses to config
askervin 9281388
build: bump NRI to v0.11.0 in order to adjust Linux scheduler
askervin a301269
cache: enable setting scheduling params in cached containers
askervin 8c2a56f
balloons: implement scheduling classes
askervin 2149af8
e2e: test configuring scheduling in balloons
askervin 3ae169b
doc: document balloons scheduling classes
askervin 716b9dc
config,crds: add topology-aware scheduling classes.
klihub bfde6b7
topology-aware: implement scheduling class support.
klihub 107ee8c
e2e: add topology-aware tests for scheduling classes.
klihub be49f4e
docs: document topology-aware scheduling classes.
klihub File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
...as in previous comment, I might have applied annotated scheduling class without any hesitation. But that's because I'm always eager giving a gun to the user who asks it, not because it would necessarily be wise. You probably have good reasons, like we don't want realtime BestEffort workloads to eat all available CPUs...