[GEM][Backport] Introducing GE21 rechit container for Run 3#50557
[GEM][Backport] Introducing GE21 rechit container for Run 3#50557yeckang wants to merge 1 commit intocms-sw:CMSSW_16_0_Xfrom
Conversation
|
A new Pull Request was created by @yeckang for CMSSW_16_0_X. It involves the following packages:
@Martin-Grunewald, @Moanwar, @cmsbuild, @ctarricone, @gabrielmscampos, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen, @mmusich, @nothingface0, @rseidita, @srimanob can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
test parameters:
|
|
please test |
| MinOneOverPtError=cms.double(1.0), | ||
| TTRHBuilder=cms.string("hltESPTTRHBWithTrackAngle"), | ||
| magneticField=cms.string("ParabolicMf"), | ||
| beamSpot=cms.InputTag("hltOnlineBeamSpot") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What is this removal about? It does not seem part of the master PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh, maybe I made a mistake when I copied the file from the old workspace. I will revert and push it again
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
b81347e to
1277b98
Compare
|
Pull request #50557 was updated. @Martin-Grunewald, @Moanwar, @cmsbuild, @ctarricone, @gabrielmscampos, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen, @mmusich, @nothingface0, @rseidita, @srimanob can you please check and sign again. |
|
please test |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
backport of #49476 |
|
backport of #50556 |
|
+hlt
|
|
+dqm |
PR description:
Currently, we are not saving them because of the possibility of interruption in the muon reconstruction performance.
However, several groups studying GE21 performance continue to ask if we can save them.
For this reason, GEM DPG decides to save them in a separate rechit container, which does not propagate to the muon reco system.
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for: