[b/474913468, 479101966] CI/CD Optimization - #544
Conversation
|
Note Gemini is unable to generate a summary for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported. |
TalShafir1
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have one main question:
Do we want to keep these in different files?
If so let's separate them to folders based on content type and then on contribution source
integrations/google
integrations/third_party
playbooks...
mp
tipcommon
...
If not (this is the plan we wanted to go with when more content types are added):
Let's have one mega flow that controls everything, and based on the PR's changed files it will know which other flows to run - tests, code checks, builds etc...
This might will also help us determine what's required and what not. One single required to pass flow that knows which sub flows to run |
|
FYI Since some job names were changed they will not run here |
CI/CD Optimization: uv Adoption and Conditional Windows Workflows
This PR focuses on optimizing the CI/CD pipeline for speed, consistency, and resource efficiency.
Key Changes:
🎯 Targeted Workflow Execution:
⚡ Fast Dependency Management (
uv):🪟 Optimized Windows Workflows: