Conversation
Owner
|
I like the PR, but I think it's probably better to keep this in user land for now until there's a solid proposal that works with the existing methods and across drivers. FWIW Postgres also uses the same syntax, but also infers the types in the driver itself. For now you can write Does duckdb always require the type in the SQL statement or does it also have a way that it automatically infers? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
DuckDB has a unique way of formatting arguments that requires the type be specified after a
?::for positional arguments.I added support for my own use case and it seems to work well.
DuckDB documentation: https://duckdb.org/docs/api/nodejs/overview