Skip to content

Conversation

@dependabot
Copy link

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Dec 27, 2024

Bumps coverage from 7.6.4 to 7.6.10.

Changelog

Sourced from coverage's changelog.

Version 7.6.10 — 2024-12-26

  • Fix: some descriptions of missing branches in HTML and LCOV reports were incorrect when multi-line statements were involved (issue 1874_ and issue 1875_). These are now fixed.

  • Fix: Python 3.14 defers evaluation of annotations <pep649_>_ by moving them into separate code objects. That code is rarely executed, so coverage.py would mark them as missing, as reported in issue 1908_. Now they are ignored by coverage automatically.

  • Fixed an obscure and mysterious problem on PyPy 3.10 seemingly involving mocks, imports, and trace functions: issue 1902_. To be honest, I don't understand the problem or the solution, but git bisect helped find it, and now it's fixed.

  • Docs: re-wrote the :ref:subprocess page to put multiprocessing first and to highlight the correct use of :class:multiprocessing.Pool <python:multiprocessing.pool.Pool>.

.. _issue 1874: nedbat/coveragepy#1874 .. _issue 1875: nedbat/coveragepy#1875 .. _issue 1902: nedbat/coveragepy#1902 .. _issue 1908: nedbat/coveragepy#1908 .. _pep649: https://docs.python.org/3.14/whatsnew/3.14.html#pep-649-deferred-evaluation-of-annotations

.. _changes_7-6-9:

Version 7.6.9 — 2024-12-06

  • Fix: Tomas Uribe fixed <pull 1901_>_ a performance problem in the XML report. Large code bases should produce XML reports much faster now.

.. _pull 1901: nedbat/coveragepy#1901

.. _changes_7-6-8:

Version 7.6.8 — 2024-11-23

  • Fix: the LCOV report code assumed that a branch line that took no branches meant that the entire line was unexecuted. This isn't true in a few cases: the line might always raise an exception, or might have been optimized away. Fixes issue 1896_.

  • Fix: similarly, the HTML report will now explain that a line that jumps to

... (truncated)

Commits
  • f0dcf65 docs: sample HTML for 7.6.10
  • 0f26f35 docs: prep for 7.6.10
  • 81c5e43 docs: rewrite the subprocess page
  • 878410c chore: make doc_upgrade
  • f1d320d chore: make upgrade
  • 67f1440 debug: this condition is never true. really?
  • c85eaba fix: multi-line statements no longer confuse branch target descriptions. #187...
  • 73e58fa refactor: clarify the code that fixes with-statement exits
  • e16c9cc typo: backslask
  • 865fd7f chore: bump the action-dependencies group with 4 updates (#1909)
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [coverage](https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy) from 7.6.4 to 7.6.10.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/blob/master/CHANGES.rst)
- [Commits](coveragepy/coveragepy@7.6.4...7.6.10)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: coverage
  dependency-type: direct:development
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@dependabot dependabot bot added dependencies Upgrade or downgrade of project dependencies python Pull requests that update Python code labels Dec 27, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link

There hasn't been any activity on this pull request recently, so it has automatically been marked as stale and will be closed if no further action occurs within 7 days. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale There has not been activity on this issue or PR for some time label Jan 26, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Feb 3, 2025
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Feb 3, 2025

OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next major or minor version, let me know by commenting @dependabot ignore this major version or @dependabot ignore this minor version. You can also ignore all major, minor, or patch releases for a dependency by adding an ignore condition with the desired update_types to your config file.

If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts on it.

@dependabot dependabot bot deleted the dependabot/pip/coverage-7.6.10 branch February 3, 2025 08:15
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 4, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

dependencies Upgrade or downgrade of project dependencies python Pull requests that update Python code stale There has not been activity on this issue or PR for some time

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants