Conversation
|
@danielhollas I'm trying a few things, but I'm confident I don't understand this side of things well enough 😅 Nevertheless, the problem remains. All recent PRs fail due to size limits. Thoughts? |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1421 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 72.18% 72.20% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 108 108
Lines 7259 7259
==========================================
+ Hits 5240 5241 +1
+ Misses 2019 2018 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I haven't run into this problem before. Just one quick thought, it's perhaps worth trying to bump docker/build-push-action@v5 to docker/build-push-action@v6.
Otherwise the most straightforward way is to simply disable caching (to at least see if that fixes things?).
I also think somebody should invest time in addressing the root problem and slim down the image. Last time I looked there was possibly a lot of low-hanging fruit, I started looking into it in #1337, please have a look at that PR (I've revived it today and made a bit of progress but will not have time to pursue it tomorrow).
af17dda to
76cfae9
Compare
76cfae9 to
535a95f
Compare
|
@superstar54 effort is already underway in #1337 by @danielhollas. This PR is another attempt at resolving the issue of dealing with a massive image. Let's discuss at the coding week. |
This PR attempts to add some cleanup prior to image build and reduce cache explosion to reduce image size, which is currently failing all tests due to size limit exceeding.