Conversation
this might be bebefitial for parallel scans as worker might be better balances. However improvemt in useless kafkaNext calls when subsequent KafkaScanP are close to each other might be needed.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
this adds two new scan methods
kafka_custom_msglenis added here as a rather useless examplethis also add the experimental
expandKafkaScanPDatamethods which would split the expandKafkaScanPData into chunks of batch size allowing multiple parallel workers to do the job better, but this seems not to be very fruitfull