Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade alpine from 3.20.3 to 3.21.5#9654

Open
YounixM wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
snyk-fix-14f5056daf080727c265467371264ce2
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade alpine from 3.20.3 to 3.21.5#9654
YounixM wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
snyk-fix-14f5056daf080727c265467371264ce2

Conversation

@YounixM
Copy link
Member

@YounixM YounixM commented Nov 23, 2025

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 4 vulnerabilities in the dockerfile dependencies of this project.

Keeping your Docker base image up-to-date means you’ll benefit from security fixes in the latest version of your chosen image.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • ee/query-service/Dockerfile

We recommend upgrading to alpine:3.21.5, as this image has only 0 known vulnerabilities. To do this, merge this pull request, then verify your application still works as expected.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
low severity CVE-2025-26519
SNYK-ALPINE320-MUSL-8720638
  364  
low severity CVE-2025-26519
SNYK-ALPINE320-MUSL-8720638
  364  
low severity CVE-2025-9230
SNYK-ALPINE320-OPENSSL-13174134
  364  
low severity CVE-2025-9231
SNYK-ALPINE320-OPENSSL-13174135
  364  
low severity CVE-2025-9232
SNYK-ALPINE320-OPENSSL-13174136
  364  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.


Note

Upgrade ee/query-service Docker base image from alpine:3.20.3 to 3.21.5.

Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 316b843. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@github-actions
Copy link

Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id>

2 similar comments
@github-actions
Copy link

Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id>

@github-actions
Copy link

Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id>

Copy link

@cursor cursor bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the final PR Bugbot will review for you during this billing cycle

Your free Bugbot reviews will reset on December 3

Details

Your team is on the Bugbot Free tier. On this plan, Bugbot will review limited PRs each billing cycle for each member of your team.

To receive Bugbot reviews on all of your PRs, visit the Cursor dashboard to activate Pro and start your 14-day free trial.

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
# use a minimal alpine image
FROM alpine:3.20.3
FROM alpine:3.21.5
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bug: Inconsistent Alpine versions between EE and non-EE

The Alpine upgrade to 3.21.5 only applies to the EE Dockerfile, while pkg/query-service/Dockerfile remains at Alpine 3.20.3. This creates an inconsistent security posture where the non-EE version still contains the CVE vulnerabilities this PR intends to fix, leaving one variant of the query service unpatched.

Fix in Cursor Fix in Web

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants