[CNV-63822] Test plan out-out of role aggregation#28
[CNV-63822] Test plan out-out of role aggregation#28rlobillo wants to merge 1 commit intoRedHatQE:mainfrom
Conversation
WalkthroughAdds a new Quality Engineering Software Test Plan (STP) document for the Role Aggregation Opt-Out feature (CNV-63822) under Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 🧹 Recent nitpick comments
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Report bugs in Issues Welcome! 🎉This pull request will be automatically processed with the following features: 🔄 Automatic Actions
📋 Available CommandsPR Status Management
Review & Approval
Testing & Validation
Cherry-pick Operations
Label Management
✅ Merge RequirementsThis PR will be automatically approved when the following conditions are met:
📊 Review ProcessApprovers and ReviewersApprovers:
Reviewers:
Available Labels
💡 Tips
For more information, please refer to the project documentation or contact the maintainers. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@stps/sig-iuo/CNV-63822-role-aggregation-opt-out/stp.md`:
- Around line 122-123: Update the test framework table entry that currently
reads "ginkgo for tier1 tests inside kubevirt repo" to use the proper noun
"Ginkgo" (i.e., "Ginkgo for tier1 tests inside kubevirt repo"); locate the table
row under the "Test Framework" heading and replace the lowercase "ginkgo" token
with "Ginkgo" to match upstream documentation and the adjacent "pytest" usage.
- Around line 158-161: The table rows for KubeVirt PR `#16350` are missing entries
in the "Test Scenario(s)" column; update the four rows whose descriptions start
with "RoleAggregationStrategy config should keep aggregate labels when
RoleAggregationStrategy is nil", "RoleAggregationStrategy configuration should
keep aggregate labels when RoleAggregationStrategy is AggregateToDefault",
"RoleAggregationStrategy configuration should create ClusterRole without
aggregate labels when RoleAggregationStrategy is Manual", and
"RoleAggregationStrategy configuration should remove aggregate labels from
existing ClusterRole when strategy changes to Manual" by adding a concrete test
scenario text for each (briefly describe the test steps and expected outcome)
or, if upstream merge is pending, insert "TBD" in the Test Scenario(s) column
for each row so traceability is preserved.
- Line 162: Change the YAML boolean to lowercase: update the example that sets
the HCO spec key spec.roleAggregation.enabled from `False` to `false` so it
conforms to YAML/Kubernetes boolean conventions and standard YAML 1.2
formatting.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
stps/sig-iuo/CNV-63822-role-aggregation-opt-out/stp.md (2)
9-10: Include the VEP issue in the Metadata “Enhancement(s)” field.The enhancement reference is currently a PR; consider adding the VEP issue link (and keep the PR in notes) so the metadata points to the canonical enhancement record. Based on learnings: “In the openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs repository, not all features have OpenShift enhancement PRs. When no enhancement PR exists, it's acceptable to reference only the HLD (High-Level Design) document in the Enhancement(s) field of the STP metadata table.”
Also applies to: 42-42
158-161: Avoid repeating the same Requirement ID across consecutive rows.For the KubeVirt PR
#16350rows, leave the Requirement ID blank after the first row to reduce redundancy. Based on learnings: “In the openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs repository, when documenting test scenarios in the "Test Scenarios & Traceability" table where multiple test scenarios fall under the same epic, it's acceptable and preferred to leave the Requirement ID cells empty for subsequent rows after the first row which contains the epic ID (e.g., CNV-28924 (epic)). Repeating the epic ID in each row is considered redundant.”
| | **Test Framework** | ginkgo for tier1 tests inside kubevirt repo | | ||
| | | pytest with openshift-virtualization-tests for tier2 tests | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Capitalize the Ginkgo framework name.
Use “Ginkgo” (proper noun) for consistency with upstream documentation.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~122-~122: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...----| | Test Framework | ginkgo for tier1 tests inside kubevirt repo |...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
[grammar] ~123-~123: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...with openshift-virtualization-tests for tier2 tests | | CI/CD | Stand...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@stps/sig-iuo/CNV-63822-role-aggregation-opt-out/stp.md` around lines 122 -
123, Update the test framework table entry that currently reads "ginkgo for
tier1 tests inside kubevirt repo" to use the proper noun "Ginkgo" (i.e., "Ginkgo
for tier1 tests inside kubevirt repo"); locate the table row under the "Test
Framework" heading and replace the lowercase "ginkgo" token with "Ginkgo" to
match upstream documentation and the adjacent "pytest" usage.
| | KubeVirt PR #16350 | `RoleAggregationStrategy config should keep aggregate labels when RoleAggregationStrategy is nil` || tier1 automation | P0 | | ||
| | KubeVirt PR #16350 | `RoleAggregationStrategy configuration should keep aggregate labels when RoleAggregationStrategy is AggregateToDefault` || tier1 automation | P0 | | ||
| | KubeVirt PR #16350 | `RoleAggregationStrategy configuration should create ClusterRole without aggregate labels when RoleAggregationStrategy is Manual` || tier1 auto | P0 | | ||
| | KubeVirt PR #16350 | `RoleAggregationStrategy configuration should remove aggregate labels from existing ClusterRole when strategy changes to Manual` || tier1 auto | P0 | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fill in missing “Test Scenario(s)” for upstream KubeVirt PR cases.
The test scenario column is empty for these rows, which breaks traceability. Please add concrete scenario text or mark them as “TBD” until the upstream merge lands.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@stps/sig-iuo/CNV-63822-role-aggregation-opt-out/stp.md` around lines 158 -
161, The table rows for KubeVirt PR `#16350` are missing entries in the "Test
Scenario(s)" column; update the four rows whose descriptions start with
"RoleAggregationStrategy config should keep aggregate labels when
RoleAggregationStrategy is nil", "RoleAggregationStrategy configuration should
keep aggregate labels when RoleAggregationStrategy is AggregateToDefault",
"RoleAggregationStrategy configuration should create ClusterRole without
aggregate labels when RoleAggregationStrategy is Manual", and
"RoleAggregationStrategy configuration should remove aggregate labels from
existing ClusterRole when strategy changes to Manual" by adding a concrete test
scenario text for each (briefly describe the test steps and expected outcome)
or, if upstream merge is pending, insert "TBD" in the Test Scenario(s) column
for each row so traceability is preserved.
| | KubeVirt PR #16350 | `RoleAggregationStrategy configuration should keep aggregate labels when RoleAggregationStrategy is AggregateToDefault` || tier1 automation | P0 | | ||
| | KubeVirt PR #16350 | `RoleAggregationStrategy configuration should create ClusterRole without aggregate labels when RoleAggregationStrategy is Manual` || tier1 auto | P0 | | ||
| | KubeVirt PR #16350 | `RoleAggregationStrategy configuration should remove aggregate labels from existing ClusterRole when strategy changes to Manual` || tier1 auto | P0 | | ||
| | CNV-63822 (Acceptance 1) | Feature can be enabled via config | Set `spec.roleAggregation.enabled: False` in HCO CR; verify config persists | tier2 automation | P0 | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
# First, let's look at the file to understand the context
git ls-files | grep -E "stp\.md|STP" | head -20Repository: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs
Length of output: 216
🏁 Script executed:
# Find and read the specific file
find . -name "stp.md" -path "*CNV-63822*" 2>/dev/null | head -5Repository: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs
Length of output: 151
🏁 Script executed:
# Check if file exists in the repo
find . -name "stp.md" | head -10Repository: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs
Length of output: 178
🏁 Script executed:
# Read the specific file to see the context around line 162
cat -n ./stps/sig-iuo/CNV-63822-role-aggregation-opt-out/stp.md | sed -n '155,170p'Repository: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs
Length of output: 3024
🏁 Script executed:
# Let's see more context to understand what this table is documenting
cat -n ./stps/sig-iuo/CNV-63822-role-aggregation-opt-out/stp.md | sed -n '145,175p'Repository: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs
Length of output: 3603
🏁 Script executed:
# Look for any HCO API specification or examples in the repo
find . -type f \( -name "*.md" -o -name "*.yaml" -o -name "*.yml" \) -exec grep -l "spec.roleAggregation" {} \; 2>/dev/nullRepository: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs
Length of output: 151
🏁 Script executed:
# Search for any references to HCO CR or YAML configs in the doc
grep -r "roleAggregation\|HCO CR" ./stps --include="*.md" | head -20Repository: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs
Length of output: 476
🏁 Script executed:
# Check if there are any actual YAML examples or API definitions in the repo
find . -type f -name "*.yaml" -o -name "*.yml" | xargs grep -l "roleAggregation" 2>/dev/null | head -10Repository: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs
Length of output: 77
🌐 Web query:
Kubernetes YAML boolean format lowercase false vs False
💡 Result:
In Kubernetes manifests, false and False are both typically accepted as booleans when the target Kubernetes API field is a boolean, because the YAML parsers commonly used in the Kubernetes toolchain (Go YAML) preserve YAML 1.1-style boolean resolution (case variants like False, and even yes/no/on/off in some contexts). [1][3][4]
That said, the portable / safest form is:
- Use lowercase JSON-compatible booleans:
true/false(YAML 1.2 aligns booleans to these). [2]
And if you actually need the literal string "false" (common in Kubernetes):
- ConfigMap
data:values are strings, so write"false"(quoted), notfalse(boolean). [5]
Rule of thumb: use false (lowercase) for boolean-typed fields; use "false" (quoted) for string-typed fields (ConfigMap data, most env var values, etc.). [2][5]
Sources:
[1] YAML 1.1 bool type (includes false|False|FALSE, etc.) https://yaml.org/type/bool.html
[2] YAML 1.2 spec (booleans true/false) https://yaml.org/spec/1.2-old/spec.html
[3] go-yaml issue discussing YAML 1.1 booleans vs YAML 1.2 behavior go-yaml/yaml#214
[4] Go YAML docs noting 1.1 bool compatibility https://pkg.go.dev/go.yaml.in/yaml/v4
[5] ConfigMap data must be strings; quote "false" https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63905890/kubernetes-how-to-set-boolean-type-variable-in-configmap
🌐 Web query:
YAML 1.2 boolean values lowercase true false
💡 Result:
In YAML 1.2, the canonical boolean forms are the lowercase scalars:
truefalse[1]
However, under YAML 1.2’s Core schema (the recommended default), many parsers also accept the case variants:
True,TRUE,False,FALSE[2]
If you need strict JSON compatibility (YAML as a JSON superset), use only lowercase true / false. [1]
Sources:
[1] YAML 1.2.2 “Changes in version 1.2” (yaml.org)
[2] YAML 1.2 discussion of JSON vs Core schema boolean resolution (Stack Overflow)
🏁 Script executed:
# Look at the full STP document to understand context better
head -100 ./stps/sig-iuo/CNV-63822-role-aggregation-opt-out/stp.mdRepository: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs
Length of output: 7895
🏁 Script executed:
# Check for any examples or documentation about HCO API
grep -n -A 5 -B 5 "spec.roleAggregation" ./stps/sig-iuo/CNV-63822-role-aggregation-opt-out/stp.mdRepository: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs
Length of output: 2203
Use lowercase YAML boolean (false) instead of False.
Kubernetes YAML conventions use lowercase booleans; change spec.roleAggregation.enabled: False to spec.roleAggregation.enabled: false for consistency with standard YAML 1.2 and Kubernetes documentation.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@stps/sig-iuo/CNV-63822-role-aggregation-opt-out/stp.md` at line 162, Change
the YAML boolean to lowercase: update the example that sets the HCO spec key
spec.roleAggregation.enabled from `False` to `false` so it conforms to
YAML/Kubernetes boolean conventions and standard YAML 1.2 formatting.
STP ready for QE team review while waiting for upstream merge
4 participants
STP Metadata
VEP issue: kubevirt/enhancements#160
What this PR does
STP ready for QE team review while waiting for upstream merge
Special notes for your reviewer
Summary by CodeRabbit