Update lone pairs and multiplicities for radicals saturated for HBI

[pierrelb]

Your multiplicity is taken from the original radical molecule and the hydrogens added to saturate the radical take the default number of lone pairs (-100). Updating them corrects the InvalidAdjacencyListError due to inconsistencies such as:

multiplicity 3
1  C U0 L0 E0  {2,S} {3,S} {5,S} {11,S}
2  C U0 L0 E0  {1,S} {4,S} {7,S} {12,S}
3  C U0 L0 E0  {1,S} {4,S} {8,S} {13,S}
4  C U0 L0 E0  {2,S} {3,S} {14,S} {15,S}
5  C U0 L0 E0  {1,S} {16,S} {17,S} {18,S}
6  C U0 L0 E0  {9,S} {19,S} {20,S} {21,S}
7  C U0 L0 E0  {2,S} {9,D} {22,S}
8  C U0 L0 E0  {3,S} {10,D} {23,S}
9  C U0 L0 E0  {6,S} {7,D} {24,S}
10 C U0 L0 E0  {8,D} {25,S} {26,S}
11 H U0 L0 E0  {1,S}
12 H U0 L0 E0  {2,S}
13 H U0 L0 E0  {3,S}
14 H U0 L0 E0  {4,S}
15 H U0 L0 E0  {4,S}
16 H U0 L0 E0  {5,S}
17 H U0 L0 E0  {5,S}
18 H U0 L-100 E0  {5,S}
19 H U0 L0 E0  {6,S}
20 H U0 L0 E0  {6,S}
21 H U0 L-100 E0  {6,S}
22 H U0 L0 E0  {7,S}
23 H U0 L0 E0  {8,S}
24 H U0 L0 E0  {9,S}
25 H U0 L0 E0  {10,S}
26 H U0 L0 E0  {10,S}

Are there other cases? Transport?
Thanks to @bslakman for the help

[rwest]

This looks like an improvement to me so I'm merging, but I do wonder:

1. how did Beat do it for the normal Benson thermo case?
2. are we now doing very similar things in three or four places? Can we refactor (perhaps open an issue for now and fix it later)
3. We probably do need it in Transport
4. Is setting the multiplicity to radical count + 1 necessary and/or the best solution?