Check the port handler is non nullptr before trying to close it#405
Check the port handler is non nullptr before trying to close it#405Jack-Punter wants to merge 2 commits intoROBOTIS-GIT:mainfrom
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @Jack-Punter, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the robustness of the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly adds a null check for portHandler_ in the DynamixelDriver destructor before calling closePort(), which prevents a potential crash. This is a good defensive programming practice.
Regarding your question about memory management: you are correct not to delete portHandler_. The dynamixel::PortHandler::getPortHandler() method returns a pointer to a singleton instance managed by the SDK, so you don't need to manually free it.
However, for a complete and robust fix, two related issues should be addressed:
-
Uninitialized Pointer: The member pointer
portHandler_is not initialized in theDynamixelDriverconstructor. In C++, uninitialized member pointers hold garbage values, which can cause theportHandler_ != nullptrcheck to behave unpredictably. Please initializeportHandler_tonullptrin the constructor's initializer list to ensure this check is always safe. -
Missing Null Check in
setPortHandler: In thesetPortHandlermethod, the return value ofdynamixel::PortHandler::getPortHandler(device_name)is not checked fornullptrbefore being used. This could lead to a crash ifgetPortHandlerfails. A null check should be added there as well.
While this PR is a good step, addressing these additional points will make the code more robust.
dynamixel_workbench_toolbox/src/dynamixel_workbench_toolbox/dynamixel_driver.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
c0568f2 to
6eb6ec0
Compare
Fixes #404 by first validating the port_handler_ is not null.
I haven't looked at the sdk code so i'm going to assume that we don't need to free this pointer, but its unclear whether this is needed or not from the headers.