Skip to content

Provide a compatibility option for clients with broken data set order.#20

Open
ctheune wants to merge 1 commit intoPylons:masterfrom
ctheune:htmx-workaround-1686-wrong-form-dataset-construction
Open

Provide a compatibility option for clients with broken data set order.#20
ctheune wants to merge 1 commit intoPylons:masterfrom
ctheune:htmx-workaround-1686-wrong-form-dataset-construction

Conversation

@ctheune
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ctheune ctheune commented Aug 9, 2023

I stumbled over an incorrect form data set construction order in HTMX. I made a bug report there
(bigskysoftware/htmx#1686) but need a work around in the meantime.

They seem to take care of ordering as long as the names are unique.

This is backwards compatible to avoid downstream breakage.

I stumbled over an incorrect form data set construction order
in HTMX. I made a bug report there
(bigskysoftware/htmx#1686) but need a work
around in the meantime.

They seem to take care of ordering as long as the names are unique.

This is backwards compatible to avoid downstream breakage.
@ctheune ctheune changed the title Provide a compatibility options with broken data set order. Provide a compatibility option for clients with broken data set order. Aug 9, 2023
@mcdonc
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

mcdonc commented Aug 10, 2023

Let's see if we can't work this out in the particular consumer of Peppercorn first.

@ctheune
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

ctheune commented Aug 10, 2023

Yeah, absolutely.

tseaver added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2024
@ctheune PTAL -- this seems to cause a hang for me in the tests.
@tseaver
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

tseaver commented Apr 25, 2024

@ctheune I've tried to "rebase" your changes atop my recent modernization. The test_bare_without_marker test hangs for me, though. See: 2d246b4

@ctheune
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

ctheune commented Apr 28, 2024

I'll double check this, but it will take a bit. Likely at least until end of May.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants