Update OpenSea Privacy Policy

[OTA-Bot]

🔎 Inspect this declaration update suggestion

Bots should take care of checking the formatting and the validity of the declaration. As a human reviewer, you should check:

• Selectors are:
  • stable: as much as possible, the CSS selectors are meaningful and specific (e.g. .tos-content rather than .ab23 .cK_drop > div).
  • simple: the CSS selectors do not have unnecessary specificity (e.g. if there is an ID, do not add a class or a tag).
• Generated version is:
  • relevant: it is not just a series of links, for example.
  • readable: it is complete and not mangled.
  • clean: it does not contain navigation links, unnecessary images, or extra content.

---

Thanks to your work and attention, Open Terms Archive will ensure that high quality data is available for all reusers, enabling them to do their part in shifting the balance of power towards end users and regulators instead of spending time collecting and cleaning documents 💪

Fixes #3838

---

This update suggestion has been created through the undefined, which enables graphical declaration of documents. You can load it on your local instance if you have one set up.

[OTA-Bot]

🔎 Inspect the updated declaration suggestion

A new suggestion has been made to update this declaration, voiding the previous ones. As a human reviewer, here are the things you should check:

• Selectors are:
  • stable: as much as possible, the CSS selectors are meaningful and specific (e.g. .tos-content rather than .ab23 .cK_drop > div).
  • simple: the CSS selectors do not have unnecessary specificity (e.g. if there is an ID, do not add a class or a tag).
• Generated version is:
  • relevant: it is not just a series of links, for example.
  • readable: it is complete and not mangled.
  • clean: it does not contain navigation links, unnecessary images, or extra content.

---

This suggestion has been created through the undefined, which enables graphical declaration of documents. You can load it on your local instance if you have one set up.

[Cli4d]

Hi @Stefan4D,

Thank you for your contribution to updating the terms for continued tracking. I have reviewed your pull request and made a few minor changes. I found the previous selectors somewhat complex, so I simplified them to reduce the need for future maintenance.

I appreciate the time you took to contribute to restoring these terms for tracking. I will merge this pull request.