Skip to content

GREAT-NLPKE/Benchmarks-for-NLP

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

28 Commits
 
 

Repository files navigation

Benchmarks-for-NLP

Open-Source LLM (10-35B, Chinese & English)

Leaderboard from OpenCompass

Model Org. Param. Examination Language Knowledge Understanding Reasoning
GPT-4 OpenAI N/A 77.2 62 73.5 70 74.4
ChatGLM3-6B-Base ZhipuAI 6B 67.2 52.4 62 70.3 67.4
Qwen-14B Alibaba 14B 71.3 52.7 56.1 68.8 60.1
Yi-34B 01.AI 34B 78.1 48.9 64.5 69.2 55.5
Qwen-14B-Chat Alibaba 14B 71.2 52.1 61.2 68.2 54.9
InternLM-20B Shanghai AI Lab & SenseTime 20B 62.5 55 60.1 67.3 54.9
Aquila2-34B BAAI 34B 70 47.2 59.2 66.9 50.1
Baichuan2-13B-Chat Baichuan Intelligent Technology 13B 59.8 51.5 51.9 63.1 50.1

GLUE Benchmark (NLU Tasks, English)

Single-task single models on dev

Model MNLI QNLI QQP RTE SST MRPC CoLA STS
BERT-large 86.6 92.3 91.3 70.4 93.2 88.0 60.6 90.0
XLNet-large 89.8 93.9 91.8 83.8 95.6 89.2 63.6 91.8
RoBERTa-large 90.2 94.7 92.2 86.6 96.4 90.9 68.0 92.4
ALBERT-xxlarge 90.8 95.3 92.2 89.2 96.9 90.9 71.4 93.0

其它语言模型

  1. ERNIE 3.0:自回归与自编码结合的框架
  2. BART:编码器mask+解码器自回归
  3. PERT:基于文本乱序自监督的预训练编码器
  4. MacBERT:针对中文提出Whole Word Masking和N-gram masking技术

About GLUE

  1. CoLA:单句二分类任务,判断是否符合语法。
  2. SST:单句二分类任务,判断情感积极/消极。
  3. MRPC:双句释义二分类,判断两句话是否相同含义。
  4. STS:双句相似性回归任务,1-5之间打分。
  5. QQP:双句相似性分类任务,判断两句问句含义是否相同。
  6. MNLI:三分类任务,判断两句关系:包含、矛盾和中立。输入句子对,一个为条件,另一个为假设。
  7. QNLI:二分类,判断问题和句子之间是否为包含关系。
  8. RTE:二分类,判断句子对是否互为包含关系。

Named Entity Recognition

F1 for all

LLM

Method Param. Org. Year CoNLL03 OntoNotes ACE05 BC5CDR NCBI
UniversalNER 7B University of Southern California, Microsoft Research 2023 93.30 89.91 86.69 89.34 86.96

Flat NER

Method Model Org. Year CoNLL03(Eng) OntoNotes
ACE BiLSTM-CRF + BiLSTM-Biaffine ShanghaiTech, UCAS, DAMO ACL2021 94.6
CL-KL Bio-BERT + CRF DAMO ACL2021 93.56
BOPN BERT-Large+BiLSTM+CLN+3DConv CAS, UCAS, Meituan EMNLP2023 93.19 91.16
PromptNER RoBERTa-large ZJU ACL 2023 93.08
PIQN BERT+2BiLSTM ZJU, DAMO ACL2022 92.87 90.96
BART NER BART-large FDU ACL2021 93.24 90.38
Locate and Label BERT-large-cased ZJU, USTC ACL2021 92.94
Named Entity Recognition as Dependency Parsing BERT-Large + fastText embeddings Queen Mary University, Google Research ACL2020 92.5 89.83

Nested NER

Method Model Org. Year ACE04 ACE05 Genia KBP17
BOPN BERT-Large+BiLSTM+CLN+3DConv CAS, UCAS, Meituan EMNLP2023 89.26 90.39 82.14
PromptNER RoBERTa-large ZJU ACL 2023 88.72 88.26
PIQN BERT+2BiLSTM ZJU, DAMO ACL2022 88.14 87.42 81.77 84.50
Locate and Label BERT-large-cased ZJU, USTC ACL2021 87.41 86.67 80.54 84.05
BART NER BART-large FDU ACL2021 86.84 84.74 79.23
Named Entity Recognition as Dependency Parsing BERT-Large + fastText embeddings Queen Mary University, Google Research ACL2020 85.67 84.61 78.87
Neural Architectures for Nested NER through Linearization seq2seq+BERT+Flair Charles University ACL2019 84.40 84.33 78.31

Biomedical NER

Method Model Org. Year BC5CDR NCBI-disease
BINDER PubMedBERT Microsoft Research ICLR 2023 91.9 90.9
ConNER BioBERT/BioLM Korea University Oxford University Press 2022 91.3 89.9
CL-KL Bio-BERT + CRF DAMO ACL2021 90.93 88.96
BioFLAIR BioFLAIR (V1)+BioELMo Manipal Institute of Technology, Elsevier Labs Arxiv2019 89.42 88.85
BioBERT BioBERT Korea University, Clova AI Oxford University Press 2020 87.70(token-level F1)

Relation Extraction

RE F1 for all
DocRED is a large scale dataset constructed from Wikipedia and Wikidata.
CDR(Chemical-Disease Reactions) is a biomedical dataset constructed using PubMed abstracts.
GDA(Gene-Disease Associations) is also a binary relation classification task that identify Gene and Disease concepts interactions.

Document-level

Reproduced Method Model Org. Year DocRED-Test Re-DocRED-Test
DocRE-CLiP BERT Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology AAAI2024 68.51 81.55
AA-RE RoBERTa-large Beihang University EMNLP2023 64.98 81.20
DREEAM RoBERTa-large Tokyo Institute of Technology ACL2023 64.27 80.73
SAIS RoBERTa-large CMU, Stanford NAACL 2022 65.11 -
EIDER RoBERTa-large University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign ACL2022 64.79 -
KD-DocRE RoBERTa-large DAMO, National University of Singapore ACL2022 64.28 78.65
SSAN RoBERTa-large USTC, Baidu AAAI2021 61.42 -

Sentence-level

Method Model Org. Year TACRED SemEval
SuRE PEGASUS University of Southern California EMNLP 2022 75.1 89.7
GPT-RE GPT3 Kyoto University EMNLP 2023 70.97 91.82
NLI DeBERTa Ixa NLP Group,UPV/EHU EMNLP 2021 73.9 -

Biomedical

Method Model Org. Year CDR GDA
SAIS SciBERT CMU, Stanford NAACL 2022 79.0 87.1
EIDER SciBERT University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign ACL2022 70.63 84.54
SSAN SciBERT USTC, Baidu AAAI2021 68.7 83.7

Joint Entity and Relation Extraction

Reproduced Method Encoder Year ACE05 ACE04 SciERC
Ent Rel Rel+ Ent Rel Rel+ Ent Rel Rel+
HGERE BERT/SciBERT EMNLP 2023 90.2 70.7 67.5 89.9 68.2 64.2 74.9 55.7 43.6
HGERE ALBERT EMNLP 2023 91.9 73.5 70.8 91.9 71.9 68.3
GCN BERT ACL 2019 90.2 69.6 66.5 90 67.6 63.5 74.1 54.8 42.9
GCN ALBERT ACL 2019 91.7 73.1 69.9 92 71.5 67.9
Nguyen et al., 2021 BERT ACL 2021 88.9 68.9
DyGIE++ BERT ACL 2019 88.6 63.4 67.5 48.4
DyGIE++ albert ACL 2019 89.5 67.6 64.3 88.6 63.3 59.6
PURE BERT ACL 2021 90.1 67.7 64.8 89.2 63.9 60.1 68.9 50.1 36.8
PURE ALBERT ACL 2021 90.9 69.4 67.0 90.3 66.1 62.2
MFVI BERT 90.2 69.7 67.1 89.7 67.4 63.4 73.3 54.7 42.5
MFVI ALBERT 91.6 72.7 70.1 89.9 68.5 65.1
PL-Marker(re)* BERT ACL 2022 90 69.8 66.7 89.5 66.6 62.1 71.3 52.3 40.2
PL-Marker(re)* ALBERT ACL 2022 91.5 72.9 70.2 91.6 70.2 66.6

Key Information Extraction

SROIE : Scanned receipts OCR and information extraction
CORD is a Consolidated Receipt Dataset for Post-OCR Parsing.
FUNSD is a Form Understanding in Noisy Scanned Documents (FUNSD) comprises 199 real, fully annotated, scanned forms.
F1 for all.
default: BASE-MODEL

Reproduced Model Org. Year Modality SROIE CORD FUNSD
GeoLayoutLM-Large DAMO CVPR 2023 T+L+V - 97.97 92.86
LayoutLMv3 Sun Yat-sen University, Microsoft Research Asia ACM MM 2022 T+L+V 95.30 96.56 90.29
LILT SCUT ACL 2022 T+L+V 97.65 95.11 -
GenKIE University of Michigan, National University of Defense Technology EMNLP 2023 T+L+V 97.40 95.75 83.45
DocFormer AWS AI ICCV2021 T+L+V - 96.33 83.34
StrucText Baidu ACM MM 2021 T+L+V 96.88 - 83.09

Link Prediction

MRR: mean reciprocal rank
Hits@k: H@k for brevity

WN18RR

Reproduced Model Method Org. Year MRR H@1 H@3 H@10
MoCoSA description-based Kuaishou Technology 2023 69.6 62.4 73.7 82.0
PMD description-based Tsinghua University 2024 67.8 58.8 73.7 82.0
SimKGC description-based Microsoft Research Asia, Yuanfudao AI Lab ACL 2022 67.1 58.7 73.1 81.7
CSPromp-KG structure-based Nanyang Technological University ACL 2023 57.5 52.2 59.6 67.8
KG-S2S description-based Nanyang Technological University COLING 2022 57.4 53.1 59.5 66.1
NBFNet structure-based Mila - Québec AI Institute NeurIPS 2021 55.1 49.7 57.3 66.6
C-LMKE description-based Fudan University IJCAI 2022 59.8 48.0 67.5 80.6
TuckER structure-based University of Edinburgh, Samsung AI Centre COLING 2019 47.0 44.3 48.2 52.6
KICGPT description-based South University of Science and Technology EMNLP 2024 56.4 47.8 61.2 67.7

About

NLP模型基线 & benchmark汇总

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors