Open-Source LLM (10-35B, Chinese & English)
Leaderboard from OpenCompass
Model
Org.
Param.
Examination
Language
Knowledge
Understanding
Reasoning
GPT-4
OpenAI
N/A
77.2
62
73.5
70
74.4
ChatGLM3-6B-Base
ZhipuAI
6B
67.2
52.4
62
70.3
67.4
Qwen-14B
Alibaba
14B
71.3
52.7
56.1
68.8
60.1
Yi-34B
01.AI
34B
78.1
48.9
64.5
69.2
55.5
Qwen-14B-Chat
Alibaba
14B
71.2
52.1
61.2
68.2
54.9
InternLM-20B
Shanghai AI Lab & SenseTime
20B
62.5
55
60.1
67.3
54.9
Aquila2-34B
BAAI
34B
70
47.2
59.2
66.9
50.1
Baichuan2-13B-Chat
Baichuan Intelligent Technology
13B
59.8
51.5
51.9
63.1
50.1
GLUE Benchmark (NLU Tasks, English)
Single-task single models on dev
Model
MNLI
QNLI
QQP
RTE
SST
MRPC
CoLA
STS
BERT-large
86.6
92.3
91.3
70.4
93.2
88.0
60.6
90.0
XLNet-large
89.8
93.9
91.8
83.8
95.6
89.2
63.6
91.8
RoBERTa-large
90.2
94.7
92.2
86.6
96.4
90.9
68.0
92.4
ALBERT-xxlarge
90.8
95.3
92.2
89.2
96.9
90.9
71.4
93.0
其它语言模型
ERNIE 3.0 :自回归与自编码结合的框架
BART :编码器mask+解码器自回归
PERT :基于文本乱序自监督的预训练编码器
MacBERT :针对中文提出Whole Word Masking和N-gram masking技术
About GLUE
CoLA:单句二分类任务,判断是否符合语法。
SST:单句二分类任务,判断情感积极/消极。
MRPC:双句释义二分类,判断两句话是否相同含义。
STS:双句相似性回归任务,1-5之间打分。
QQP:双句相似性分类任务,判断两句问句含义是否相同。
MNLI:三分类任务,判断两句关系:包含、矛盾和中立。输入句子对,一个为条件,另一个为假设。
QNLI:二分类,判断问题和句子之间是否为包含关系。
RTE:二分类,判断句子对是否互为包含关系。
F1 for all
Method
Param.
Org.
Year
CoNLL03
OntoNotes
ACE05
BC5CDR
NCBI
UniversalNER
7B
University of Southern California, Microsoft Research
2023
93.30
89.91
86.69
89.34
86.96
Method
Model
Org.
Year
BC5CDR
NCBI-disease
BINDER
PubMedBERT
Microsoft Research
ICLR 2023
91.9
90.9
ConNER
BioBERT/BioLM
Korea University
Oxford University Press 2022
91.3
89.9
CL-KL
Bio-BERT + CRF
DAMO
ACL2021
90.93
88.96
BioFLAIR
BioFLAIR (V1)+BioELMo
Manipal Institute of Technology, Elsevier Labs
Arxiv2019
89.42
88.85
BioBERT
BioBERT
Korea University, Clova AI
Oxford University Press 2020
87.70(token-level F1)
Relation Extraction
RE F1 for all
DocRED is a large scale dataset constructed from Wikipedia and Wikidata.
CDR (Chemical-Disease Reactions) is a biomedical dataset constructed using PubMed abstracts.
GDA (Gene-Disease Associations) is also a binary relation classification task that identify Gene and Disease concepts interactions.
Reproduced
Method
Model
Org.
Year
DocRED -Test
Re-DocRED -Test
DocRE-CLiP
BERT
Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology
AAAI2024
68.51
81.55
✅
AA-RE
RoBERTa-large
Beihang University
EMNLP2023
64.98
81.20
DREEAM
RoBERTa-large
Tokyo Institute of Technology
ACL2023
64.27
80.73
SAIS
RoBERTa-large
CMU, Stanford
NAACL 2022
65.11
-
EIDER
RoBERTa-large
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
ACL2022
64.79
-
KD-DocRE
RoBERTa-large
DAMO, National University of Singapore
ACL2022
64.28
78.65
SSAN
RoBERTa-large
USTC, Baidu
AAAI2021
61.42
-
Method
Model
Org.
Year
TACRED
SemEval
SuRE
PEGASUS
University of Southern California
EMNLP 2022
75.1
89.7
GPT-RE
GPT3
Kyoto University
EMNLP 2023
70.97
91.82
NLI
DeBERTa
Ixa NLP Group,UPV/EHU
EMNLP 2021
73.9
-
Method
Model
Org.
Year
CDR
GDA
SAIS
SciBERT
CMU, Stanford
NAACL 2022
79.0
87.1
EIDER
SciBERT
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
ACL2022
70.63
84.54
SSAN
SciBERT
USTC, Baidu
AAAI2021
68.7
83.7
Joint Entity and Relation Extraction
Reproduced
Method
Encoder
Year
ACE05
ACE04
SciERC
Ent
Rel
Rel+
Ent
Rel
Rel+
Ent
Rel
Rel+
✅
HGERE
BERT/SciBERT
EMNLP 2023
90.2
70.7
67.5
89.9
68.2
64.2
74.9
55.7
43.6
✅
HGERE
ALBERT
EMNLP 2023
91.9
73.5
70.8
91.9
71.9
68.3
GCN
BERT
ACL 2019
90.2
69.6
66.5
90
67.6
63.5
74.1
54.8
42.9
GCN
ALBERT
ACL 2019
91.7
73.1
69.9
92
71.5
67.9
Nguyen et al., 2021
BERT
ACL 2021
88.9
68.9
DyGIE++
BERT
ACL 2019
88.6
63.4
67.5
48.4
DyGIE++
albert
ACL 2019
89.5
67.6
64.3
88.6
63.3
59.6
PURE
BERT
ACL 2021
90.1
67.7
64.8
89.2
63.9
60.1
68.9
50.1
36.8
PURE
ALBERT
ACL 2021
90.9
69.4
67.0
90.3
66.1
62.2
MFVI
BERT
90.2
69.7
67.1
89.7
67.4
63.4
73.3
54.7
42.5
MFVI
ALBERT
91.6
72.7
70.1
89.9
68.5
65.1
✅
PL-Marker(re)*
BERT
ACL 2022
90
69.8
66.7
89.5
66.6
62.1
71.3
52.3
40.2
✅
PL-Marker(re)*
ALBERT
ACL 2022
91.5
72.9
70.2
91.6
70.2
66.6
Key Information Extraction
SROIE : Scanned receipts OCR and information extraction
CORD is a Consolidated Receipt Dataset for Post-OCR Parsing.
FUNSD is a Form Understanding in Noisy Scanned Documents (FUNSD) comprises 199 real, fully annotated, scanned forms.
F1 for all.
default: BASE-MODEL
Reproduced
Model
Org.
Year
Modality
SROIE
CORD
FUNSD
✅
GeoLayoutLM-Large
DAMO
CVPR 2023
T+L+V
-
97.97
92.86
LayoutLMv3
Sun Yat-sen University, Microsoft Research Asia
ACM MM 2022
T+L+V
95.30
96.56
90.29
LILT
SCUT
ACL 2022
T+L+V
97.65
95.11
-
✅
GenKIE
University of Michigan, National University of Defense Technology
EMNLP 2023
T+L+V
97.40
95.75
83.45
DocFormer
AWS AI
ICCV2021
T+L+V
-
96.33
83.34
StrucText
Baidu
ACM MM 2021
T+L+V
96.88
-
83.09
MRR: mean reciprocal rank
Hits@k: H@k for brevity
Reproduced
Model
Method
Org.
Year
MRR
H@1
H@3
H@10
❌
MoCoSA
description-based
Kuaishou Technology
2023
69.6
62.4
73.7
82.0
PMD
description-based
Tsinghua University
2024
67.8
58.8
73.7
82.0
✅
SimKGC
description-based
Microsoft Research Asia, Yuanfudao AI Lab
ACL 2022
67.1
58.7
73.1
81.7
CSPromp-KG
structure-based
Nanyang Technological University
ACL 2023
57.5
52.2
59.6
67.8
KG-S2S
description-based
Nanyang Technological University
COLING 2022
57.4
53.1
59.5
66.1
✅
NBFNet
structure-based
Mila - Québec AI Institute
NeurIPS 2021
55.1
49.7
57.3
66.6
C-LMKE
description-based
Fudan University
IJCAI 2022
59.8
48.0
67.5
80.6
TuckER
structure-based
University of Edinburgh, Samsung AI Centre
COLING 2019
47.0
44.3
48.2
52.6
KICGPT
description-based
South University of Science and Technology
EMNLP 2024
56.4
47.8
61.2
67.7