-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
fix for the list not being updated after emails were deleted in search bar #2611
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
csfercoci
wants to merge
10
commits into
Foundry376:master
Choose a base branch
from
csfercoci:master
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0f948f0
Optimistically remove threads from list view when deletion/move tasks…
Copilot cc12f26
Merge branch 'Foundry376:master' into master
csfercoci d69c253
Update mailsync submodule to TLS Gmail SNI fixes
csfercoci 6fff514
Point mailsync submodule to origin/master
csfercoci 690486b
Update mailsync submodule to merged TLS Gmail integration
csfercoci c3dd903
Update mailsync submodule to merged TLS and test fixes
csfercoci 483da65
Fix delete handling in search and scope optimistic thread removal
csfercoci ecf0aaa
Remove global Delete capture; rely on keymap input-safe handling
csfercoci 846c678
Adjust delete/remove key bindings
csfercoci 9edca2a
Merge branch 'Foundry376:master' into master
csfercoci File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm this is an interesting change, it seems like the thinking here is that if you have both a selection and a focused item, the selection should take precedence? It'd be helpful to have a repro case if you had one in mind - I wonder if this makes more sense in the vertical split view?
I think that this might be a good behavior improvement but it seems odd to do it for just the generic remove action and not the
core:archive-itemkey binding (ArchiveButton) or the TrashButton?