refactor openReport to use introSelected from useOnyx#79434
refactor openReport to use introSelected from useOnyx#79434dukenv0307 wants to merge 17 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!
|
|
@parasharrajat Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button] |
|
@parasharrajat can you please review this PR? |
src/Expensify.tsx
Outdated
| linkingChangeListener.current = Linking.addEventListener('url', (state) => { | ||
| const isCurrentlyAuthenticated = hasAuthToken(); | ||
| openReportFromDeepLink(state.url, currentOnboardingPurposeSelected, currentOnboardingCompanySize, onboardingInitialPath, allReports, isCurrentlyAuthenticated); | ||
| openReportFromDeepLink(state.url, currentOnboardingPurposeSelected, currentOnboardingCompanySize, onboardingInitialPath, allReports, isCurrentlyAuthenticated, introSelected); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I only have doubt of passing values here from Onyx. Is there a way to test deeplink on native devices. https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C08CZDJFJ77/p1768744138373239
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let's try npx uri-scheme open "expensify://open/report?reportID=id" --android and it seems to be fine
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let's wait for the other PR to settle where we have similiar question. Based on the direction on that thread, we can move here.
|
@parasharrajat It's ready for review again |
|
@parasharrajat Updated! |
|
@parasharrajat can you please review this PR? |
| const reportID = getReportIDFromLink(initialURL ?? null); | ||
| if (reportID && !isAuthenticatedAtStartup) { | ||
| Report.openReport(reportID); | ||
| Report.openReport(reportID, introSelected); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think here the introSelected can be undefined, @tgolen by looking at this PR, I can see many places where it can be undefined. Should we still refactor this key? May be it is better to keep the subscriptions on lib for this functions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If we used that reasoning, then we wouldn't be doing any of these refactors. I think it's normal for values like this to be undefined so we just need to handle those cases appropriately.
I think the original code had the same problem with possible undefined values, because I don't see any kind of a if (!val) return; in the Onyx.connect() callback.
|
@dukenv0307 This PR picked up some conflicts. Can you solve them so we can get this merged soon? |
|
@tgolen I merged main cc @parasharrajat |
|
TS errors @dukenv0307 |
|
@parasharrajat I've merged main again and it's good now |
|
I will check this in the morning |
|
|
||
| // We are already on the parent one expense report, so just call the API to fetch report data | ||
| openReport(parentReportID); | ||
| openReport(parentReportID, undefined); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why are we not passing introSelected here and above change too?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
introSelected is used only when the onboarding isn't completed
App/src/libs/actions/Report/index.ts
Line 1292 in c6feaa4
so replaceOptimisticReportWithActualReport never runs during onboarding
parasharrajat
left a comment
parasharrajat
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewer Checklist
- I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
- I verified the correct issue is linked in the
### Fixed Issuessection above - I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
Testssection - I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the
QA stepssection - I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
- I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
- I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
- I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android: Native
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: Native
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
- If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
- I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
toggleReportand notonIconClick). - I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g.
myBool && <MyComponent />. - I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to
src/languages/*files and using the translation method - I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the
Waiting for Copylabel for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy. - I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in
STYLE.md) were followed
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
- If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
- I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
- I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like
Avatar, I verified the components usingAvatarhave been tested & I retested again) - I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
- I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
- If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a
/** comment above it */ - The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to
thisproperly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. foronClick={this.submit}the methodthis.submitshould be bound tothisin the constructor) - Any internal methods bound to
thisare necessary to be bound (i.e. avoidthis.submit = this.submit.bind(this);ifthis.submitis never passed to a component event handler likeonClick) - All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
- If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
- If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e.
StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
- If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
- If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like
Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases) - If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
- If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
- If the PR modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added
Designlabel so the design team can review the changes.
- If a new page is added, I verified it's using the
ScrollViewcomponent to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page. - If the
mainbranch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTeststeps. - I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.
07.02.2026_17.05.07_REC.mp4
🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed
|
We did not find an internal engineer to review this PR, trying to assign a random engineer to #73662 as well as to this PR... Please reach out for help on Slack if no one gets assigned! |
3 participants
Explanation of Change
Fixed Issues
$ #73662
PROPOSAL:
Tests
Test 1:
Test2:
Offline tests
QA Steps
PR Author Checklist
### Fixed Issuessection aboveTestssectionOffline stepssectionQA stepssectioncanBeMissingparam foruseOnyxtoggleReportand notonIconClick)src/languages/*files and using the translation methodSTYLE.md) were followedAvatar, I verified the components usingAvatarare working as expected)StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))npm run compress-svg)Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases)Designlabel and/or tagged@Expensify/designso the design team can review the changes.ScrollViewcomponent to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.mainbranch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTeststeps.Screenshots/Videos
Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2026-01-13.at.18.06.18.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2026-01-13.at.18.04.25.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2026-01-13.at.18.07.10.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-01-13.at.18.04.07.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-01-13.at.17.57.41.mov