feat: support federation 2.7#2088
Conversation
|
Currently this lib allows you specify you own custom |
Had a brief discussion, the plan is to check if progressive override label would work with older fed version from composition. if not, we'll have to check fed version per directives to make sure they are correctly generated. |
|
Somehow fed |
Samjin
requested review from
dariuszkuc and
samuelAndalon
and removed request for
dariuszkuc
Confirmed with Apollo it is a Rover bug and fixed with federation |
Samjin
changed the title
Samjin
changed the title
…2088) Support federation v2.7. Here's [directive details](https://www.apollographql.com/docs/graphos/schema-design/federated-schemas/reference/directives) Support [progressive @OverRide directive](https://www.apollographql.com/docs/graphos/schema-design/federated-schemas/reference/directives#progressive-override). These directives will require specific federation versions to generate schema. 1. `@authenticate` directive is generated from `2.5+` 2. `@requiresScopes` directive is generated from `2.5+` 3. `@policy` directive is generated from `2.6+` 4. `@composeDirective` directive is generated from `2.1+` 5. `@interfaceObject ` directive is generated from `2.6+` 6. `@override` directive with 2nd argument of `label` from `2.7` --------- Co-authored-by: sjin <sjin@expediagroup.com>
3 participants
Support federation v2.7. Here's directive details
Support progressive @override directive.
These directives will require specific federation versions to generate schema.
@authenticatedirective is generated from2.5+@requiresScopesdirective is generated from2.5+@policydirective is generated from2.6+@composeDirectivedirective is generated from2.1+@interfaceObjectdirective is generated from2.3+@overridedirective with 2nd argument oflabelfrom2.7