fix: replace human_bytes with human_repr::HumanCount

[hanabi1224]

Summary of changes

human_bytes::human_bytes does not accept u64 which might cause overflow error

pub fn human_bytes<T: Into<f64>>(bytes: T) -> String

Changes introduced in this pull request:

Reference issue to close (if applicable)

Closes

Other information and links

Change checklist

• I have performed a self-review of my own code,
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation. All new code adheres to the team's documentation standards,
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if possible),
• I have made sure the CHANGELOG is up-to-date. All user-facing changes should be reflected in this document.

Outside contributions

• I have read and agree to the CONTRIBUTING document.
• I have read and agree to the AI Policy document. I understand that failure to comply with the guidelines will lead to rejection of the pull request.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Replaced the byte-size formatting library with an alternative implementation across the codebase.
  • Removed an unused transitive dependency to slim the dependency footprint.
  • No user-facing behavior or output structure was changed; byte counts are formatted the same way visually.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 5aa0257d-a493-4a43-8e53-1af1d3bb7b9e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b8ab1bf and ece153b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• Cargo.toml

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• Cargo.toml

---

Walkthrough

Replaced usage of the human_bytes crate with the human_repr crate's HumanCount trait across the workspace; byte-size formatting calls changed from human_bytes(...) to the .human_count_bytes() trait method. No functional or public API changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Workspace Manifest Cargo.toml	Removed human_bytes = "0.4" and adjusted human-repr to human-repr = { version = "1", features = ["iec", "space"] }.
Byte-formatting updates src/db/gc/snapshot.rs, src/dev/subcommands/state_cmd.rs, src/tool/subcommands/archive_cmd.rs, src/utils/io/progress_log.rs, src/utils/net/download_file.rs	Added use human_repr::HumanCount as _ imports and replaced human_bytes(...) calls with the .human_count_bytes() method on integer values; changes are formatting-only with no control-flow or API modifications.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Suggested reviewers

• LesnyRumcajs
• sudo-shashank

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 66.67% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: replacing human_bytes with human_repr::HumanCount throughout the codebase.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch hm/no-human-bytes

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 30.00000% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 63.52%. Comparing base (4caac9f) to head (ece153b).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/utils/net/download_file.rs	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
src/dev/subcommands/state_cmd.rs	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
src/db/gc/snapshot.rs	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
src/tool/subcommands/archive_cmd.rs	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/utils/io/progress_log.rs	93.12% <100.00%> (ø)
src/db/gc/snapshot.rs	18.85% <0.00%> (ø)
src/tool/subcommands/archive_cmd.rs	29.47% <0.00%> (ø)
src/dev/subcommands/state_cmd.rs	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/utils/net/download_file.rs	81.09% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 6 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4caac9f...ece153b. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.