Skip to content

Added GLM, and regression terms.#24

Merged
adbartni merged 4 commits intomainfrom
statistical-terms-1
Oct 31, 2025
Merged

Added GLM, and regression terms.#24
adbartni merged 4 commits intomainfrom
statistical-terms-1

Conversation

@AlexT01010100
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Regression analysis method IRI: OBI_0200102

linear regression for analysis of continuous dependent variable IRI: STATO_0000108

Regression analysis method IRI: OBI_0200102

linear regression for analysis of continuous dependent variable IRI: STATO_0000108
@wdduncan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

wdduncan commented Apr 4, 2025

@AlexT01010100 Did you copy the STATO terms into MRIO directly? It better (preferred) to set up an import file that contains the STATO terms. @adbartni are you familiar with how to do this?

@AlexT01010100
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

AlexT01010100 commented Apr 4, 2025 via email

@wdduncan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

wdduncan commented Apr 4, 2025

If you look in the src/ontology/imports folder, you will find a file named stato_terms.txt. This is where you should add the STATO terms. After adding them, I believe the next step would be to run the make imports/stato_import.owl command within the src/ontology directory.

If you are not familiar with running make commands, then undo the changes you made to MRIO-edit.owl and add the STATO terms to stato_terms.txt. Someone else can run the make command.

We need to confirm with @adbartni that this is the workflow he set up. Do you know @addiehl ?

@addiehl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

addiehl commented Apr 5, 2025

No I don't know the workflow, apart from it being ODK based.

@adbartni adbartni reopened this Apr 8, 2025
@adbartni
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

adbartni commented Apr 8, 2025

@wdduncan You are correct, since the STATO class was already in the import terms file, we can just remove the class from MRIO-edit.owl and let ODK handle it from there.

@adbartni adbartni merged commit 128d4d0 into main Oct 31, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants