ci(fork repos): Do not create banches and commits in forks

[amilcarlucas]

It only clutters the fork repos with unused branches

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR prevents several automation workflows from running in forked repositories to avoid creating unnecessary branches/commits in forks.

Changes:

• Add a job-level guard (if: github.repository == 'ArduPilot/MethodicConfigurator') to skip execution in forks.
• Apply the same fork-skip behavior across multiple update/translation workflows.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 9 out of 9 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
.github/workflows/update_vehicle_templates.yml	Skip template-update job unless running in the upstream repo
.github/workflows/update_vehicle_components_translation.yaml	Skip components translation update job unless running in the upstream repo
.github/workflows/update_motor_diagrams.yml	Skip motor diagrams update job unless running in the upstream repo
.github/workflows/update_magfit_pdef_xml.yml	Skip magfit pdef xml update job unless running in the upstream repo
.github/workflows/update_flightcontroller_ids.yml	Skip flight controller IDs update job unless running in the upstream repo
.github/workflows/update_copyright_year.yml	Skip copyright update job unless running in the upstream repo
.github/workflows/update_configuration_steps_translation.yaml	Skip configuration steps translation job unless running in the upstream repo
.github/workflows/update_codebase_chart.yml	Skip codebase chart update job unless running in the upstream repo
.github/workflows/ai-translation.yml	Skip AI translation extraction job unless running in the upstream repo

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 10 out of 10 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 15 out of 15 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

[github-actions]

☂️ Python Coverage

current status: ✅

Overall Coverage

Lines	Covered	Coverage	Threshold	Status
11760	10937	93%	89%	🟢

New Files

No new covered files...

Modified Files

No covered modified files...

updated for commit: bca4318 by action🐍

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 23339984049

Details

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 93.095%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 23336089139:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	10948
Relevant Lines:	11760

---

💛 - Coveralls

[amilcarlucas]

@OmkarSarkar204 the test tests/unit_frontend_tkinter_battery_monitor.py::TestUploadButtonErrorHandling::test_upload_button_click_when_ui_services_unavailable is blocking on macOS on this branch. Can you please take a look at it?

[github-actions]

Test Results

    3 files   -     1      3 suites   - 1   35m 52s ⏱️ - 4m 58s
3 309 tests ±    0  3 305 ✅  -     2   4 💤 +2  0 ❌ ±0 
9 797 runs   - 3 231  9 782 ✅  - 3 227  15 💤  - 4  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit bca4318. ± Comparison against base commit 5ff9fc1.

This pull request skips 2 tests.

tests.gui_frontend_tkinter_show.TestTooltipUserExperienceIntegration ‑ test_gui_functionality_on_macos
tests.gui_frontend_tkinter_show.TestTooltipUserExperienceIntegration ‑ test_tooltip_positioning_with_retina_display

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[OmkarSarkar204]

@OmkarSarkar204 the test tests/unit_frontend_tkinter_battery_monitor.py::TestUploadButtonErrorHandling::test_upload_button_click_when_ui_services_unavailable is blocking on macOS on this branch. Can you please take a look at it?

sure and sorry for being late,
test passes perfectly locally but gives the "139" error, could be tk_root the same error was seen during the mac fix.

Isnt there a complete fix for this?

[amilcarlucas]

I fixed it by changing a focus_force to a foucus_set call.