Skip to content

(BillStatus XML v3): some list items not using <item> #205

@ryparker

Description

@ryparker

Is there any reason why the following shouldn't be replaced with <item>?

  • <amendment>
  • <summary>
  • <recordedVote>
  • <link>
  • <committeeReport>

e.g. Current implementation:

<summaries>
	<summary>
		…
	</summary>
</summaries>
<amendments>
	<amendment>
		…
		<links>
			<link>
				…
			</link>
		</links>
		<latestAction>
			<links>
				<link>
					…
				</link>
			</links>
		</latestAction>
	</amendment>
</amendments>
<actions>
	<item>
		…
		<recordedVotes>
			<recordedVote>
				…
			</recordedVote>
		</recordedVotes>
	</item>
</actions>
<committeeReports>
	<committeeReport>
		…
	</committeeReport>
</committeeReports>

e.g. Proposed implementation:

<summaries>
	<item>
		…
	</item>
</summaries>
<amendments>
	<item>
		…
		<links>
			<item>
				…
			</item>
		</links>
		<latestAction>
			<links>
				<item>
					…
				</item>
			</links>
		</latestAction>
	</item>
</amendments>
<actions>
	<item>
		…
		<recordedVotes>
			<item>
				…
			</item>
		</recordedVotes>
	</item>
</actions>
<committeeReports>
	<item>
		…
	</item>
</committeeReports>

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions