The Fibonacci-based chaos weighting system provides exponential priority weighting for system components, enabling precise resource allocation and impact assessment using mathematical principles from the Fibonacci sequence and golden ratio.
F(n) = F(n-1) + F(n-2)
1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89...
φ = (1 + √5) / 2 ≈ 1.618
F(n+1) / F(n) → φ as n → ∞
Higher Fibonacci weights create exponential differences in impact:
- Safety (F(10) = 55): 10% degradation = 5.5 impact
- Branding (F(4) = 3): 10% degradation = 0.3 impact
- 18.3x difference in impact sensitivity
import { FibonacciWeightingEngine } from './src/fibonacci/weighting.js';
const engine = new FibonacciWeightingEngine();Assigns Fibonacci weight to a component based on importance (0-100).
const safety = engine.assignWeight('Safety Systems', 95);
// {
// name: 'Safety Systems',
// fibonacciWeight: 10, // Position in sequence
// impactMultiplier: 55, // F(10) = 55
// priority: 'critical' // Auto-assigned priority
// }Priority Mapping:
- 85-100:
critical - 65-84:
high - 40-64:
medium - 0-39:
low
Calculates impact of component failure with exponential sensitivity.
const impact = engine.calculateImpact(safety, 0.1); // 10% degradation
// Returns: 5.5 (55 × 0.1)Allocates resources proportionally to Fibonacci weights.
const components = [
engine.assignWeight('Safety', 95),
engine.assignWeight('Traffic', 85),
engine.assignWeight('Cost', 70)
];
const plan = engine.optimizeAllocation(components, 100);
// {
// allocations: [
// { component: 'Safety', allocation: 48.67, percentage: 48.7 },
// { component: 'Traffic', allocation: 30.09, percentage: 30.1 },
// { component: 'Cost', allocation: 11.50, percentage: 11.5 }
// ],
// totalAllocated: 99.99,
// efficiency: 99.99
// }Groups components by risk level with weight analysis.
const paths = engine.findCriticalPaths(components);
// [
// {
// components: ['Safety', 'Auth'],
// totalWeight: 89,
// riskLevel: 'extreme',
// description: 'Critical path with 2 components (total weight: 89)'
// }
// ]Applies golden ratio refinement for optimal thresholds.
const refined = engine.refineThresholdWithGoldenRatio(60);
// Returns: 97.08 (60 × φ)Assign Fibonacci weight to a component.
coherence-mcp fibonacci assign "Safety Systems" 95
# Output:
# === Fibonacci Weight Assignment ===
# Component: Safety Systems
# Importance: 95/100
# Fibonacci Position: F(10)
# Impact Multiplier: 55
# Priority: CRITICAL
# ===================================Optimize resource allocation using Fibonacci weights.
coherence-mcp fibonacci optimize --components components.json --budget 100
# Output:
# === Resource Optimization Plan ===
# Total Budget: 100
# Total Allocated: 99.99
# Efficiency: 99.99%
#
# Allocations:
# Safety Systems 48.67 (48.7%)
# Traffic Coherence 30.09 (30.1%)
# Cost Optimization 11.50 (11.5%)
# ===================================components.json format:
{
"components": [
{"name": "Safety Systems", "importance": 95},
{"name": "Traffic Coherence", "importance": 85}
]
}Generate ASCII priority heatmap.
coherence-mcp fibonacci visualize --input weights.json [--output heatmap.txt]
# Output:
# === Priority Distribution (Fibonacci Weighted) ===
#
# Safety Systems [████████████████████████████████████████] (55) 48.7%
# Traffic Coherence [█████████████████████████ ] (34) 30.1%
# Cost Optimization [█████████ ] (13) 11.5%
# ===================================================Refine threshold using golden ratio.
coherence-mcp fibonacci refine --threshold 60 --method golden-ratio
# Output:
# === Threshold Refinement ===
# Method: Golden Ratio (φ = 1.618)
# Base Threshold: 60
# Refined Threshold: 97.08
# Multiplier: 1.618x
# ============================Find critical paths in system.
coherence-mcp fibonacci paths --components components.json
# Output:
# === Critical Paths Analysis ===
#
# Path 1: EXTREME
# Total Weight: 89
# Components: Safety Systems, Traffic Coherence
# ================================The Fibonacci weighting system exposes 5 MCP tools:
{
"name": "fibonacci_assign_weight",
"arguments": {
"componentName": "Safety Systems",
"importance": 95
}
}{
"name": "fibonacci_calculate_impact",
"arguments": {
"component": {
"name": "Safety",
"fibonacciWeight": 10,
"impactMultiplier": 55,
"priority": "critical"
},
"degradation": 0.1
}
}{
"name": "fibonacci_optimize_allocation",
"arguments": {
"components": [...],
"budget": 100
}
}{
"name": "fibonacci_find_critical_paths",
"arguments": {
"components": [...]
}
}{
"name": "fibonacci_refine_threshold",
"arguments": {
"baseThreshold": 60
}
}The WAVE coherence validator uses Fibonacci weighting for score components:
// Fibonacci weights in WAVE scoring:
// - Structural: 8 (F(6)) - Most critical
// - Semantic: 5 (F(5)) - Second most important
// - Temporal: 3 (F(4)) - Least important
const fibonacci_weighted = (
structural * 8 +
semantic * 5 +
temporal * 3
) / 16;Prioritize safety over cosmetic features with exponential sensitivity:
const components = [
{ name: 'Safety Systems', weight: 34 }, // F(9)
{ name: 'Traffic Coherence', weight: 21 }, // F(8)
{ name: 'Cost Optimization', weight: 13 }, // F(7)
{ name: 'Environmental', weight: 8 }, // F(6)
{ name: 'Branding', weight: 3 } // F(4)
];
// 10% safety degradation = 3.4 impact
// 10% branding degradation = 0.3 impact
// 11.3x difference in sensitivityWeight PRs by criticality for merge order:
const prs = [
{ title: 'WAVE Validator', fibonacci: 21 }, // Foundation
{ title: 'ATOM Trail', fibonacci: 21 }, // Foundation
{ title: 'SPHINX Gates', fibonacci: 21 }, // Foundation
{ title: 'H&&S Protocol', fibonacci: 13 }, // Integration
{ title: 'Documentation', fibonacci: 5 } // Enhancement
];Apply golden ratio for optimal thresholds:
const baseThreshold = 60; // Minimum coherence
const optimalThreshold = baseThreshold * φ; // ≈ 97%
// Creates natural gap between "passing" and "optimal"
// Encourages continuous improvement beyond minimumsComprehensive test suite with 25 tests covering:
npm run test -- fibonacci-weighting
# Tests:
# ✓ Fibonacci sequence generation
# ✓ Golden ratio convergence
# ✓ Weight assignment for all priority levels
# ✓ Impact calculations with exponential scaling
# ✓ Resource optimization algorithms
# ✓ Critical path detection
# ✓ Visualization data generation
# ✓ Real-world use cases- Time Complexity: O(1) for F(1)-F(20) (pre-calculated)
- Space Complexity: O(1) constant memory
- Scalability: Handles hundreds of components efficiently
- Accuracy: IEEE 754 double precision for weights up to F(1476)
F(5) = 5 → 1x baseline
F(7) = 13 → 2.6x
F(9) = 34 → 6.8x
F(11) = 89 → 17.8x
- Threshold Refinement: Creates natural quality gaps
- Resource Allocation: Optimal proportions emerge naturally
- Impact Assessment: Self-similar scaling at all levels
F(n+1) / F(n) approaches φ as n increases:
F(6)/F(5) = 8/5 = 1.600
F(10)/F(9) = 55/34 = 1.617
F(20)/F(19) = 6765/4181 = 1.618...
- Fibonacci sequence: OEIS A000045
- Golden ratio: φ = 1.6180339887...
- WAVE protocol: docs/WAVE.md
- SpiralSafe methodology: spiralsafe.org
For issues or questions:
- GitHub Issues: https://github.com/toolate28/coherence-mcp/issues
- Documentation: https://spiralsafe.org