Skip to content

About assets ... #2

@pvretano

Description

@pvretano

I don't believe that links in a record can capture the same information provided in the assets section.

So, while a core record can point to the resource(s) that it describes, it cannot provide detailed information about the structure of the resource (e.g. band information). In order to do that, a record would need to be extended which is encouraged in the OARec standard.

Thus, I would not say that the way you include "asset" information in a record is via links in the links section. I would say that assets are simply not described in a core record and that a core record needs to be extended to include all the information that a STAC assets section includes. Put another way, STAC extends records by adding the assets section which provides more detailed information about the resource that a record describes.

So, the entry in the "Collection" table about assets should probably be updated to say that Records do not have an assets section in the same way that a records does not have a stac_version member either.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions