Licensing question for a binding I'm developing

[Neblinus]

Hello!!

I'm developing updated Ruby bindings for this library at this repository.
Its still on early stage.

I would like to know if the license for the repo is OK to you.
If not, let me know what you would like me to change!

Thanks!!

[Neblinus]

@raysan5 could you have a look, please? I don't want to harm your project in any way!!

[raysan5]

@Neblinus Is it the official unlicensed license? It's fine but note that some countries could not recognize that license and avoid using the product. Some similar libraries usually use a double license MIT or Unlicensed. You can check raylib/src/external libraries licenses.

[Neblinus]

@Neblinus Is it the official unlicensed license? It's fine but note that some countries could not recognize that license and avoid using the product. Some similar libraries usually use a double license MIT or Unlicensed. You can check raylib/src/external libraries licenses.

Well, I added a notice stating that my project is merely a binding to yours, and that I do not claim ownership over any Raylib code, just to make sure no problems arise, so, I don't know if this counts as 'official'.

Its my first open-source project, sorry for the dumbness.
I'll take a look at the licenses.

[Neblinus]

Okay, I changed the license to an official Zlib license and added a notice at the repo's readme.

[orcmid]

If you're on GitHub, you can also specify the license in the profile of the repository, so folks don't have to look for it. If you put a copy of the license at the root of the repo, I don't know if GitHub will detect it or not.

[Neblinus]

Thanks for the tip!!
Apparently, it detected, cause it is showing 'Zlib license' at the sidebar and showing the license aspects when accessing the License file.

[Neblinus]

Thanks for you all @orcmid and @raysan5 !!