You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm trying to understand why checking rule 10.6.1.f was removed? 7b6c549
# 10.6.1-f: Any field that is software-writable or clear on read shall
# not span multiple software accessible sub-words (e.g., a 64-bit
# register with a 32-bit access width may not have a writable field with
# bits in both the upper and lower half of the register).
As far as I can tell, it is still a requirement. Was it moved somewhere else in the code?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I'm trying to understand why checking rule 10.6.1.f was removed? 7b6c549
As far as I can tell, it is still a requirement. Was it moved somewhere else in the code?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions