io.objectbox.Transaction.finalize() timed out after 60 seconds

[samirshaikh2804]

Is there an existing issue?

• I have searched existing issues

Build info

• ObjectBox version: 5.0.1
• OS: Android 16 | One UI 8.0
• Device: Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (happen on any device)

Steps to reproduce

No specific steps. this issue happen everytime after i kept the app open idle for 1 or 2 minute.

Expected behavior

App Should not crash

Actual behavior

The app is mostly crashing right at startup and sometimes randomly while in middle of execution.

Logs, stack traces

FATAL EXCEPTION: FinalizerWatchdogDaemon Process: in.upstox.app.qa, PID: 11453
   java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: io.objectbox.Transaction.finalize() timed out after 60 seconds
                                             at io.objectbox.Transaction.nativeDestroy(Native Method)
                                             at io.objectbox.Transaction.close(Transaction.java:130)
                                             at io.objectbox.Transaction.finalize(Transaction.java:87)
                                             at java.lang.Daemons$FinalizerDaemon.doFinalize(Daemons.java:387)
                                             at java.lang.Daemons$FinalizerDaemon.processReference(Daemons.java:367)
                                             at java.lang.Daemons$FinalizerDaemon.runInternal(Daemons.java:339)
                                             at java.lang.Daemons$Daemon.run(Daemons.java:132)
                                             at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1119)

I see the following hint. which is the right place to call closeThreadResources()? here it is resolved just by calling closeThreadResources().

use closeThreadResources() to avoid finalizing recycled transactions (initial commit count: 7).

-->

Logs

[Paste your logs here]

[fcat97]

@samirshaikh2804 try this,

##1190 (comment)

[greenrobot-team]

@samirshaikh2804 as you asked for clarification in #1190 (comment) I guess this is about using coroutines.

@fcat97 was so nice to provide a solution and I also added some additional details in that discussion.

So closing this then as the discussion is continued there.