I fitted a XGBoost model using data that contains missing values.
For each feature, the tree dump does define to which group cases with missing data belong:
0:[f2<3] yes=1,no=2,missing=1,gain=138.535736,cover=33.6236076
However, the supertree visualization handles cases with missing data in such a way that they are counted in both leafs.
Is this intended?
I fitted a XGBoost model using data that contains missing values.
For each feature, the tree dump does define to which group cases with missing data belong:
0:[f2<3] yes=1,no=2,missing=1,gain=138.535736,cover=33.6236076
However, the supertree visualization handles cases with missing data in such a way that they are counted in both leafs.
Is this intended?