Skip to content

Why another isaac lib? #4

@AgCaliva

Description

@AgCaliva

Hi there! sory but i dont have technically so deep knowledge about ISAAC, why you implemented it again using rubycon original as base? what you wanted to accomplish and what are the differences between this lib and rubycon´s? TY
Edit:
Sory i have carefully readed readme, and now i understand, but it seems like you simplified a lot the code, this cant be bad for security? how can we know if this implementation its less, equal or more robust than original?
Sory for my questions, ty so much!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions