Skip to content

model-eval-report.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
223 lines (159 loc) · 4.81 KB

model-eval-report.md

File metadata and controls

223 lines (159 loc) · 4.81 KB
Raw

Model Evaluation Report

Metadata

Field Value
Report ID EVAL-
Model Name
Version
Experiment EXP-XXX
Author
Date
Status Draft / Final

Executive Summary

<3-4 sentences: What was evaluated, key findings, recommendation>

Verdict Rationale
Ready for production / Needs improvement / Not viable

Model Overview

Purpose

<What does this model do?>

Architecture

Field Value
Model type <Classification, regression, generative, etc.>
Base model (if fine-tuned)
Parameters
Framework <PyTorch, TensorFlow, etc.>

Training Data

Field Value
Dataset
Size
Time range
Data source
PII present Yes / No
License

Evaluation Methodology

Test Dataset

Field Value
Dataset
Size
Split
Representative <Is it representative of production?>

Metrics Evaluated

Metric Why This Metric
<Metric 1>
<Metric 2>
<Metric 3>

Evaluation Process

Performance Results

Primary Metrics

Metric Target Result Status
<Accuracy/F1/etc.> Pass / Fail
Pass / Fail
Pass / Fail
Pass / Fail

Performance by Segment

Segment Metric Result Notes
<Segment 1>
<Segment 2>

Comparison to Baseline

Model Metric 1 Metric 2 Metric 3
Baseline
This model
Delta <+/-X%> <+/-X%> <+/-X%>

Cost Analysis

Metric Value
Inference cost per request <$X.XX>
Training cost <$X,XXX>
Monthly estimated cost at scale <$X,XXX for Y requests>

Cost Comparison

Option Cost/Request Monthly Total
This model <$X.XX> <$X,XXX>
Alternative 1 <$X.XX> <$X,XXX>
Current solution <$X.XX> <$X,XXX>

Safety and Fairness

Bias Evaluation

Dimension Finding Severity
<Demographic 1> None / Low / Medium / High
<Demographic 2> None / Low / Medium / High

Safety Testing

Test Result Notes
Harmful content generation Pass / Fail
Details
Prompt injection resistance Pass / Fail
Details
PII leakage Pass / Fail
Details
Out-of-scope behavior Pass / Fail
Details

Red Team Findings

Finding Severity Mitigation
<Finding 1> Low / Medium / High / Critical

Failure Analysis

Common Failure Modes

Failure Mode Frequency Impact Example
<Mode 1> <X%> Low / Medium / High
<Mode 2> <X%> Low / Medium / High

Edge Cases

Edge Case Behavior Acceptable?
<Case 1> Yes / No
<Case 2> Yes / No

Production Readiness

Checklist

  • Meets accuracy targets
  • Meets latency targets
  • Meets cost targets
  • Bias evaluation complete
  • Safety testing complete
  • Monitoring defined
  • Rollback plan documented
  • On-call ownership assigned

Gaps Identified

Gap Severity Remediation
<Gap 1> Low / Medium / High

Recommendation

Verdict

Decision Confidence
Deploy to production / Iterate further / Do not proceed High / Medium / Low

Rationale

Conditions for Deployment

  • <Condition 1>
  • <Condition 2>

Next Steps

  1. <Action 1>
  2. <Action 2>

Appendix

Detailed Results

Model Card

Artifacts

Artifact Location
Model weights
Evaluation data
Evaluation code
Training logs