Replies: 6 comments 10 replies
-
|
hey, right now is impossible, but human in the loop is in our road map, and it will be implemented soon |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hey @anovazzi1 any updates on this? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
a poc implement #8427 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Any updates on how this initiative is progressing? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I concur this is a much needed feature |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
While waiting for native HIL support, here's a pattern that works today: State-Based Human Intervention Pointsstate = {
"workflow_id": "wf_123",
"current_step": "processing",
"requires_human_input": False,
"human_prompt": None,
"human_response": None,
"agent_outputs": {}
}
# Agent decides it needs human input
if needs_clarification:
state["requires_human_input"] = True
state["human_prompt"] = "Please confirm the customer's address"
state["current_step"] = "waiting_for_human"
# Workflow pauses here
# After human responds (via API/webhook)
state["human_response"] = user_input
state["requires_human_input"] = False
state["current_step"] = "resume_processing"Implementation Approach
Why This Works
This is the stigmergy pattern applied to HIL: coordination through shared state. More details: https://github.com/KeepALifeUS/autonomous-agents |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
Currently, only one 'chat input' component can be used in per workflow. Is it possible to use more than one?
For example, the 'chat output' can be connected to the 'chat input' to achieve HIL(human-in-the-loop) process.
Thanks.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions